Jamie Raskin Tries Playing STUPID on CNN About the MANY Pictures of Bill Clinton in the Epstein Files
Raskin discussed the Clinton photographs on CNN and criticized the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYTwitchy is a partisan blog, and this piece uses openly partisan language rather than the conventions of independently reported news. The author is identified, but the article relies heavily on selected social-media posts and does not provide a full interview or independent corroboration.
- Source type — A partisan blog rather than an established news organization.
- Editorial standards — The article uses openly partisan and mocking language.
- Author attribution — An author is named, but the article does not establish the basis for independent reporting.
- Source selection — Relies on selected clips and posts without presenting the full CNN exchange or responses from the people criticized.
The piece identifies the remarks and posts it discusses, but presents them selectively and provides little independent sourcing, context, or response from those criticized. Its mocking and partisan framing further limits its value as reporting.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article is overwhelmingly critical of Raskin and Democrats, uses ridicule, and does not offer a substantive response or fuller context for the remarks it quotes.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantive response from Raskin or a defense of his position is presented.
- Loaded language — The headline and narration use mocking and disparaging language.
- Source diversity — The article draws on selected clips and social-media posts rather than a range of sources.
- Omitted context — It does not provide the full CNN exchange or fuller context for the document-release dispute.
The article uses overtly anti-Democratic framing and ridicule, while presenting Republicans and Trump sympathetically. Its language goes well beyond neutral reporting.
- Language tone — Uses phrases such as “playing stupid” and “doesn’t get any smarter” to ridicule Raskin.
- Framing — Frames Democrats as trying to deflect from evidence involving Clinton and describes their efforts as backfiring.
- Source selection — Relies on posts and clips selected to criticize Raskin and Democrats, without presenting a countervailing account.
Twitchy criticizes Rep. Jamie Raskin’s CNN comments about photographs of Bill Clinton with Jeffrey Epstein and quotes Raskin’s claim that the Justice Department was required to release the Epstein files.
The article says Raskin defended Clinton after photographs of Clinton with Epstein were released, quoting Raskin describing Epstein as a socialite and saying, “I mean, I have no idea.” It mocks those remarks and argues that Clinton appears in multiple photographs with Epstein.
The article also quotes Raskin’s post claiming that a federal law required the Trump Justice Department to release every document in the Epstein files, and that the department released only a fraction with heavy redactions. The article portrays Democrats as deflecting from evidence involving Clinton and criticizes Raskin’s comments.
Community verdict
5 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 3
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 50% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 2 · ◆ 1 · ▼ 2
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative who commented on the Clinton photographs and the release of the Epstein files
Former president mentioned in reference to his administration
Part of a bigger story
3 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Jamie Raskin criticized the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files. Center outlets emphasize the missed deadline, extensive redactions and officials’ privacy rationale, alongside criticism from lawmakers in both parties. Right-leaning outlets ridicule Raskin’s CNN comments and frame them as part of Democrats’ effort to deflect from photographs of Bill Clinton with Jeffrey Epstein.
- ARTICLES
- 3
- OUTLETS
- 3
- AVG CRED
- 68
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





