Del. Stacey Plaskett Tells CNN 'There Are a Lot of People Who Have Done a Lot of Crimes'
Plaskett defended her communications with Epstein in a CNN interview, saying she believed he had information that could help get at the truth.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYTwitchy is a blog whose openly partisan framing in this piece suggests limited separation between reporting and commentary. The article has a named author and refers to a CNN exchange, but provides little independent reporting or corroboration.
- Source type — Blog with strongly partisan presentation in this article.
- Editorial standards — The article’s mocking language and partisan editor’s note blur reporting and advocacy.
- Author attribution — A named author is identified.
- Transparency — It refers to a CNN interview but offers little independent sourcing or corroboration.
The piece includes excerpts from Plaskett’s CNN exchange and identifies the interviewer’s challenge, but offers little independent verification or context. Its mocking language, reliance on social-media reactions, and openly partisan editor’s note substantially weaken its reporting quality.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article quotes Plaskett and includes CNN’s challenge, but its narration and selection of social-media reactions are overwhelmingly critical. It supplies little context or independent evidence to assess the competing explanations.
- Loaded language — The narration uses ridicule and dismissive phrasing.
- Counterarguments presented — Plaskett’s explanation is quoted, but it receives no substantial supporting context.
- Source diversity — The piece relies mainly on the CNN exchange and critical social-media reactions.
- Omitted context — It offers little corroboration or context for the communications or payment it describes.
The article uses ridicule and presents Plaskett’s explanation as untrustworthy, then adds an editor’s note attacking Democrats and defending conservatives. Its framing is strongly right-leaning.
- Language tone — Uses mocking phrases such as “Pedo Island” and calls the explanation “mental gymnastics.”
- Framing — Frames Plaskett’s explanation as an implausible excuse and highlights hostile reactions.
- Headline — The headline foregrounds her most damaging-sounding quotation.
- Editorial position — An editor’s note accuses Democrats of deflecting and lying about Trump and conservatives.
Twitchy criticizes Delegate Stacey Plaskett’s CNN explanation of why she communicated with Jeffrey Epstein, quoting her as saying she believed he had information that could help get at the truth. The story revisits claims about her texts and a $30,000 payment from Epstein.
Twitchy says Plaskett addressed her communications with Epstein on the House floor and later on CNN. The article reports that she said she believed Epstein had information that could help her get at the truth, and quotes her saying, “There are a lot of people who have done a lot of crimes.” CNN noted that Epstein was a known sex offender at the time. (Twitchy also says she accepted $30,000 from Epstein after his conviction.)
The article presents Plaskett’s explanation skeptically, questions her account, and includes critical social-media reactions. Its editor’s note broadly accuses Democrats of deflecting and lying about Trump, his administration, and conservatives.
Community verdict
10 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 32
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 25% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Delegate from the U.S. Virgin Islands explaining her communications with Jeffrey Epstein
President of the United States, mentioned in a commenter’s comparison
Part of a bigger story
23 OUTLETSOutlets on multiple sides report that released messages showed Plaskett exchanging texts with Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing. They also report that the House rejected a resolution to censure her over the exchanges. Left-leaning outlets frame the story around Plaskett's floor clash with Republicans and emphasize supportive reactions. Center outlets largely pair the failed censure effort with Plaskett's explanation, while some also report Republicans' claims of a related deal. Right-leaning outlets more often cast the texts as troubling conduct and stress the failed censure effort, with some also amplifying claims of a deal.
- ARTICLES
- 32
- OUTLETS
- 23
- AVG CRED
- 53
- Washington Examiner · Epstein files will 'boomerang' on Democrats, not Trump: Joe Concha
- Atlanta Black Star · 'It's Lowkey Insane': Congressional Hearing Erupts Into Chaos After Democrat Hits Trump With The F-Word, Triggering The Most Dramatic GOP Outrage Yet
- Blaze Media · Epstein files backfire as Democrats get pulled into their own trap
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


