Bill Melugin Puts Chuck Schumer on the SPOT for Trashing ICE and Border Patrol and HOOBOY (Watch)
Schumer said he stood by his call for reform of ICE and Border Patrol but did not answer a follow-up about respect for the agencies.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYTwitchy is a blog whose strongly partisan commentary in this piece does not demonstrate the standards of a broadly accountable news organization. The article attributes the central exchange to a reporter’s social media post, but provides little independent reporting or context.
- Source type — A blog with an overtly partisan presentation, rather than an established general-news newsroom.
- Editorial standards — The article uses highly charged language and offers little separation between commentary and reporting.
- Author attribution — An author is named, and the reported exchange is attributed to a reporter’s post.
The central exchange is attributed and includes Schumer’s response, but the piece largely reproduces a social-media exchange and surrounds it with one-sided commentary. It provides little additional sourcing, context, or competing perspective.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece includes Schumer’s brief response but gives no broader context for his position or meaningful counterpoint to its strongly critical commentary.
- Loaded language — The author uses repeated insults and characterizations such as “hateful” and “political hack.”
- Counterarguments presented — Schumer’s short response appears, but the article does not develop his rationale or include another perspective.
- Source diversity — The article relies on the exchange and critical social-media reactions.
The article uses strongly negative language about Schumer and Democrats, while presenting the exchange through a critical, right-leaning frame.
- Language tone — Calls Schumer’s remarks “ugly” and “hateful” and uses mocking language.
- Framing — Frames the exchange as exposing Schumer’s unwillingness to answer for his remarks.
- Source selection — Includes critical social-media reactions without comparable responses supporting Schumer’s position.
Bill Melugin asked Chuck Schumer whether he stood by saying that nobody respects ICE and Border Patrol. Schumer said the agencies need reform and that he stood by his comments, but did not answer Melugin’s follow-up question.
The article reports that Schumer said the previous week that nobody in the country respects ICE and Border Patrol. When reporter Bill Melugin asked whether he stood by that comment, Schumer said the agencies need reform and that he stood by that position. Asked again whether he believed nobody respected the agencies, Schumer did not respond.
Community verdict
2 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 8
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 50% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 1 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 1
People in this story
SWIPE →Senate minority leader questioned about his comments on ICE and Border Patrol
President of the United States, mentioned in a list of subjects Democrats allegedly avoid discussing
Part of a bigger story
7 OUTLETSSchumer criticized ICE and Border Patrol during a Senate debate over DHS funding, saying nobody respects the agencies. His remarks drew public rebukes, including from Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin. Center outlets place Mullin’s personal attack alongside Schumer’s preceding criticism and the funding dispute. Right-leaning outlets foreground condemnations of Schumer and often frame his remarks as an attack on immigration enforcement.
- ARTICLES
- 8
- OUTLETS
- 7
- AVG CRED
- 45
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


