Skip to main content
3 min read
● InformationalCriminal Justice

Appeals Court Tosses Rep. LaMonica McIver's Claim of Legislative Immunity

A federal appeals court rejected McIver’s claim that legislative immunity should shield her from the charges.

Appeals Court Tosses Rep. LaMonica McIver's Claim of Legislative Immunity
Image · twitchy.com

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilitytwitchy.com38/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Oct 10, 2026
Aug 26, 2026
tl;dr

A federal appeals court rejected Rep. LaMonica McIver’s claim that legislative immunity shielded her from criminal charges stemming from an encounter with ICE officers. The article reports that the criminal case will continue, while McIver has been indicted on three counts.

Community verdict

VOTING CLOSED
How does this story look for
LaMonica McIver D · NJ-10
NOT RATEDCLOSED

No good or bad look here

This story reports what happened without casting McIver in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward McIver’s record.

● INFORMATIONAL

People in this story

SWIPE →
LaMonica McIver
D · NJ-10

Representative whose legislative-immunity defense against criminal charges was rejected on appeal

PRIMARY SUBJECT
George Santos
Former U.S. Representative (R-NY)

Former representative mentioned in a social-media comparison about expulsion

Don Bacon
R · NE-2

Mentioned in a social-media post that says he voted against a censure measure concerning McIver

Part of a bigger story

7 OUTLETS
Appeals Court Allows Two Charges Against LaMonica McIver to Proceed

A federal appeals court allowed two charges against Rep. LaMonica McIver to proceed and sent a third back for further review. The charges stem from an encounter at an ICE facility, and McIver had argued that immunity should shield her. Center outlets focus on the court’s ruling and responses, with some highlighting the dissent’s concern about possible political retaliation. Right-leaning outlets frame the decision as a win against McIver or a rejection of her immunity claim, with some using dismissive language.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…