When It Comes to Epstein Associations, Rep. Jamie Raskin Has a Clear Double Standard
Raskin defended Plaskett’s call with Epstein, prompting Curtis to accuse him of applying a double standard.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYTownhall is an established but strongly partisan outlet, and this page is explicitly opinion rather than independent news reporting. The article names its author and quotes Raskin, but relies on a sharply framed argument and a video excerpt without much additional sourcing or context.
- Source type — Opinion-first outlet; partisan commentary warrants a lower score than straight reporting.
- Editorial standards — The article is openly argumentative and uses loaded language rather than presenting a reported, multi-perspective account.
- Author attribution — The page names Amy Curtis as the author.
- Transparency — It identifies a video excerpt as the basis for the comparison but provides limited reporting context.
The article identifies the statements at issue and presents excerpts for comparison, but offers little independent reporting, context, or response from the people criticized. Its loaded language and one-sided argument limit its journalistic quality.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article advances a critical argument about Raskin and Democrats but does not include responses from them or substantial counterarguments. The quoted remarks provide some evidence for the comparison, but the piece presents only one side.
- Counterarguments presented — No response from Raskin, Plaskett, Jeffries, or Swalwell is included.
- Loaded language — The author uses strongly evaluative descriptions, including “absurd” and “hypocrisy.”
- Source diversity — The article relies chiefly on selected remarks and a video excerpt, without varied sources.
- Opinion vs reporting — The page is an opinion piece whose author explicitly argues that Raskin applies a double standard.
The article strongly criticizes Democrats and Raskin, uses explicitly partisan language, and frames the comparison as evidence of hypocrisy. Its presentation is distinctly right-leaning.
- Language tone — Uses terms such as “absurd,” “breathtaking,” and “hypocrisy” in the author’s voice.
- Framing — Organizes the article around the claim that Democrats apply a double standard about Epstein associations.
- Headline — The headline explicitly accuses Raskin of having a “Clear Double Standard.”
Amy Curtis argues that Rep. Jamie Raskin applied a double standard by defending Rep. Stacey Plaskett’s call with Jeffrey Epstein while previously describing Epstein as a sex-trafficking mastermind in remarks about Donald Trump. The article contrasts Raskin’s statements and criticizes his defense of Plaskett.
The article says Raskin defended Plaskett’s phone call with Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing, characterizing Epstein as her constituent and questioning what ethical rule had been violated. Curtis criticizes that defense, emphasizing that Epstein was a sex trafficker.
Curtis contrasts those remarks with a video excerpt in which Raskin described Epstein as a child sex-trafficking mastermind while discussing Donald Trump and the Epstein files. She argues that Democrats apply different standards to associations with Epstein depending on the person’s party.
Community verdict
13 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 9
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 55% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative criticized for defending Stacey Plaskett’s call with Jeffrey Epstein and for contrasting that defense with his earlier remarks about Epstein.
President discussed in the video excerpt contrasting Raskin’s remarks about Epstein.
Representative mentioned as having accused Republicans of running a “pedophile protection ring.”
House Minority Leader mentioned as having accused Republicans of running a “pedophile protection ring.”
Representative whose call with Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 hearing is defended by Raskin.
Part of a bigger story
7 OUTLETSJamie Raskin defended Stacey Plaskett over her communications with Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing. Right-leaning outlets portray Raskin’s defense negatively; several frame it as a double standard, while others stress ethical concerns about Plaskett’s communications and the censure effort.
- ARTICLES
- 9
- OUTLETS
- 7
- AVG CRED
- 50
- redstate.com · 'Full of Crap': James Comer Lights Up Raskin Over Ridiculous 'Constituent' Defense of Stacey Plaskett
- twitchy.com · Try Not to Get Whiplash During Jamie Raskin's FAST One-Eighty on Epstein When Defending a Dem Colleague
- New York Post · White House rips House Democrat's 'sick' defense of colleague who texted Jeffrey Epstein during 2019 hearing
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




