Ken Paxton took nearly 1,000 trips with state-funded security detail costing millions of dollars
The investigation found extensive state-funded security travel with little documented state business and no detailed response from his office.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Texas Tribune is an established regional newsroom, and this investigation was co-published with ProPublica, a nonprofit investigative newsroom. The article identifies its authors and describes its records-based reporting.
- Source type — An established Texas news organization with a strong regional reporting role.
- Editorial standards — The work is co-published with ProPublica and includes a records-based investigative method.
- Transparency — The article explains the records reviewed and the limits of the available records.
- Author attribution — The byline names the reporting organizations and the lead reporter.
The article supports its findings with public records, comparative data and named experts, and it includes the attorney general’s office’s response. The office did not provide detailed answers, leaving that side of the account limited.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The investigation presents extensive documentary findings and includes the office’s security-threat explanation and context about the attorney general’s work. The office declined detailed questions, and most quoted assessments of the travel raise concerns.
- Source diversity — The article draws on records, officials, academics and former attorneys general.
- Counterarguments presented — The office’s explanation that Paxton faced security threats is included, though it did not address the trips individually.
- Omitted context — It notes that some attorney general work requires travel and that the records are incomplete in some respects.
- Loaded language — Critical ethical characterizations are attributed to sources rather than presented as the newsroom’s verdict.
The article uses investigative and critical framing but relies on records, attributes judgments to named sources and includes the attorney general’s office’s defense. Its language and reporting do not establish a discernible partisan lean.
- Language tone — Mostly factual wording, with critical judgments attributed to sources.
- Source selection — Includes records, outside experts, comparisons with other officials and the office’s response.
- Framing — Focuses on taxpayer costs and undocumented travel, without an explicit partisan argument.
A joint investigation found that Ken Paxton took nearly 1,000 trips with a state-funded security detail since 2015, while records linked only a fraction to state business. Paxton’s office did not provide detailed answers about the trips.
ProPublica and The Texas Tribune reviewed travel records and found that Paxton took nearly 1,000 trips with state-funded security since taking office in 2015, at a reported cost of $3.3 million. The newsrooms could connect 138 trips and $553,000 in security costs to state business; records showed no listed business purpose for more than 800 trips. The analysis also found that only one in six trips had a listed business purpose.
The newsrooms reported trips to places where Paxton or his family trust owned property, as well as travel during his 2023 suspension and to campaign-related activities. Ethics experts questioned whether taxpayers should cover security for personal trips and campaign events. Paxton’s office said his work had generated security threats, but neither he nor his office provided the requested trip-specific records.
Community verdict
17 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 5
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 3 · ◆ 4 · ▼ 10
People in this story
SWIPE →Texas attorney general and U.S. Senate candidate whose state-funded security travel is examined
U.S. senator whom Paxton suggested he might challenge in the 2026 Republican primary
Part of a bigger story
4 OUTLETSAn investigation found Ken Paxton took nearly 1,000 trips with state-funded security, while records linked only a fraction to state business. Left-leaning outlets frame the spending as misuse of public funds, with one highlighting trips during Paxton’s suspension; center outlets emphasize the records, limited stated business purposes and his office’s lack of detailed answers.
- ARTICLES
- 5
- OUTLETS
- 4
- AVG CRED
- 72
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

