Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for BondiCongress / MembersCriminal Justice

The Source |Jasmine Crockett Clashes With Attorney General Bondi Over Epstein Files

Bondi defended her appearance after Crockett accused her of mishandling the Epstein-related files and avoiding questions.

The Source |Jasmine Crockett Clashes With Attorney General Bondi Over Epstein Files
Image · The Source

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityThe Source56/100 MEDIUM
This article1 analysis · Oct 10, 2026
Feb 12, 2026
tl;dr

At a Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Jasmine Crockett accused Attorney General Pam Bondi and the administration of mishandling Epstein-related files and shielding powerful figures. Bondi disputed Crockett’s approach to questioning, and Crockett later left the hearing room.

Community verdict

24 VOTES
How does this story look for

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 105

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →

Attorney general who responded to Crockett during a Judiciary Committee hearing

PRIMARY SUBJECT

Representative who criticized Bondi and the Justice Department at a Judiciary Committee hearing

Crockett's version of this story ↗
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

Part of a bigger story

27 OUTLETS
Pam Bondi Faces Questions on Epstein Files at House Hearing

At a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Pam Bondi defended the Justice Department’s handling of the Epstein files as lawmakers questioned her about redactions, disclosures and the department’s process. Left-leaning outlets focus on allegations of mishandling, shielding powerful figures and Bondi’s confrontational responses. Center outlets mostly recount clashes and specific questions about redactions, victim information and file access, often including both Bondi’s defense and lawmakers’ challenges. Right-leaning outlets foreground clashes with Democratic lawmakers and often cast their questioning as partisan, while some emphasize Bondi’s defenses or Republican criticism of the Biden-era Justice Department.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…