Some of Maine's members of Congress will skip Trump's State of the Union

Credibility rates Portland Press Herald, which carries this article. The other scores rate the article itself. Portland Press Herald's published outlet score.

The report provides specific attendance plans and attributes them to a spokesperson or the lawmakers, with some context from the previous year. It is brief and offers little additional sourcing or explanation.

The report gives the attendance plans of Democratic and Republican Maine lawmakers, though it is a short account rather than a broader examination of the event or its arguments.

• ▸Source diversity — Reports plans from lawmakers of both parties, with a direct quote from Golden and a spokesperson's account for Pingree.
• ▸Opinion vs reporting — The piece is presented as factual news rather than commentary.
• ▸Counterarguments presented — No policy dispute requiring counterarguments is explored.

The article reports attendance plans and past events in largely neutral language, attributing the lawmakers’ statements without endorsing them.

• ▸Language tone — Mostly descriptive wording; the article attributes critical language to Pingree.
• ▸Framing — Focuses on who plans to attend or skip the address and how they will follow it.
• ▸Source selection — Includes statements or plans from members on both sides of the attendance question.