Thomas Gallatin: Colbert, Talarico Lie About FCC 'Ban'
Talarico said the FCC had refused to air his interview, while the article cites CBS’s account that the show chose YouTube.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Patriot Post is an opinion publisher, and this article uses overtly partisan language rather than the conventions of straight reporting. It attributes CBS’s explanation and quotes the people discussed, but offers little independent sourcing or opposing analysis.
- Source type — Opinion outlet; the article’s framing is openly partisan.
- Source diversity — The piece includes CBS’s statement and remarks from the people involved, but does not develop competing interpretations.
- Author attribution — A named contributor is credited.
- Editorial standards — The text provides no information about corrections practices or reporting standards.
The article includes CBS’s account and quotes statements from Colbert, Talarico and Crockett, but it relies heavily on the author’s assertions and does not independently examine the FCC letter or provide a fuller response from the people criticized.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes CBS’s explanation and quotes the claims it disputes, but the author’s strongly critical framing dominates and the piece does not present a developed counterargument from Colbert or Talarico.
- Loaded language — The article uses repeated insults and accusatory language about Colbert and Talarico.
- Counterarguments presented — CBS’s statement and the candidates’ and host’s claims appear, but their positions are not explored in depth.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an opinion column and openly advances the author’s verdict.
- Source diversity — It cites CBS’s statement and quotes several involved figures, but offers limited independent sourcing.
The article uses strongly pro-Trump, anti-Colbert and anti-Talarico language, including dismissive labels and accusations of dishonesty. Its framing treats the FCC’s position as legitimate and the claims of censorship as false.
- Language tone — Uses partisan insults and labels, including “Trump derangement” and “Orange Man Bad.”
- Framing — Presents the FCC’s position as ordinary application of an existing rule and describes the censorship claims as false.
- Source selection — Includes CBS’s statement, but does not offer a substantive defense from Colbert or Talarico beyond quoting their claims.
Thomas Gallatin argues that CBS chose to put James Talarico’s interview with Stephen Colbert on YouTube, with broadcast promotion, rather than air it on television because of equal-time concerns—not because the FCC banned it. The article criticizes Colbert and Talarico for describing the decision as censorship.
Gallatin says the FCC’s equal-time rule could require CBS to offer other candidates, including Jasmine Crockett, an opportunity to appear. He cites CBS’s statement that the network did not prohibit the interview and that the show chose YouTube and on-air promotion rather than potentially providing equal-time options. The article also notes that the Communications Act of 1934 established the rule.
The article quotes Colbert describing the interview as blocked after legal guidance and Talarico claiming the Trump administration had silenced or censored him. Gallatin calls those claims false, while noting Crockett’s view that the episode probably gave Talarico a boost.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Talarico in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Talarico’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Texas state representative and Democratic Senate candidate whose interview and comments are central to the dispute
U.S. representative and Democratic Senate candidate identified as one of the candidates potentially eligible for equal time
President whose administration Talarico accused of censorship
Democratic Senate candidate mentioned as another candidate in the Texas primary
Part of a bigger story
24 OUTLETSOutlets agree that CBS did not air Stephen Colbert’s planned interview with Texas Senate candidate James Talarico on television; it appeared online instead. Left-leaning outlets frame the dispute as CBS yielding to FCC guidance, centering Colbert’s challenge to the network’s explanation. Center outlets generally present competing accounts of why the interview did not air, while some also stress its online audience and Talarico’s fundraising. Right-leaning outlets emphasize CBS’s equal-time explanation and often reject the censorship claim, with some linking the episode to Talarico’s fundraising.
- ARTICLES
- 37
- OUTLETS
- 24
- AVG CRED
- 62
- Latin Times · Jasmine Crockett Takes Aim At James Talarico In New Ad As Texas Democratic Primary Heats Up: 'Doesn't Practice What He Preaches'
- 930 WFMD Free Talk · Democrats have 'done Jasmine Crockett dirty,' in attempt to wound campaign, GOP strategist tells MS NOW
- Fox News · GOP strategist says Jasmine Crockett done 'dirty' in Colbert controversy
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


