GOP Senator Tries to Trap Jack Smith—and Gets Every Detail Wrong
Schmitt accused Jack Smith of lying about an Atlanta trip, then said he was trying to see whether Smith would ensnare himself in more lies.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New Republic is an established publication with identifiable authorship, but its opinion format and openly partisan framing warrant a lower score than a straight-news report.
- Source type — Published as opinion, so the piece is not presented as neutral news reporting.
- Transparency — The article identifies its author and publisher.
- Editorial standards — The established publication provides an identifiable editorial home, though this article uses overtly argumentative framing.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
The article includes direct quotations from the hearing and Schmitt’s later explanation, along with details about the displayed messages. Its sharply critical framing and limited range of sources make it less balanced as journalism.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes statements from Schmitt and Smith as well as Klobuchar’s response, but its language and narrative strongly favor the view that Schmitt’s accusation was careless and politically motivated.
- Loaded language — The headline and article use strongly dismissive descriptions of Schmitt’s conduct.
- Counterarguments presented — Schmitt’s explanation of his questioning is included, alongside Smith’s denial and Klobuchar’s criticism.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is explicitly opinion and blends reporting with its own judgments.
- Source diversity — The account relies mainly on remarks by the people involved and a review of the displayed messages.
The piece uses strongly critical language about Schmitt and Republicans, while presenting the incident as evidence of a failed political attack. Its framing is clearly left-leaning rather than neutral.
- Language tone — Uses dismissive phrases including “beclowns himself” and “lazy research.”
- Framing — Frames the questioning as an effort by Republicans to attack Smith and as a failed gotcha attempt.
- Source selection — Includes Schmitt’s response but foregrounds Klobuchar’s rebuttal and the article’s critical interpretation.
At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Senator Eric Schmitt accused former special counsel Jack Smith of lying about a trip to Atlanta, but later details indicated Smith had attended a Maryland college basketball game instead. Senator Amy Klobuchar challenged Schmitt’s accusation, and Schmitt later said he had been seeking a “gotcha moment.”
At a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Schmitt asked Smith whether he had attended an Atlanta Hawks game on the day Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis disclosed her relationship with prosecutor Nathan Wade. Smith said he had not gone to a Hawks game and later recalled attending a Maryland–Iowa college basketball game. Klobuchar suggested the confusion could involve Iowa’s Hawkeyes and said the game was in Maryland. A closer look at the text messages Schmitt displayed found no mention of the Hawks.
Schmitt accused Smith of perjury and called him a “dirtbag,” but declined to display the text messages again after Smith asked to see them. Later, Schmitt said on a radio show that his job was to ask questions; he also said he was trying to see whether Smith would ensnare himself in more lies. The article characterizes Schmitt’s questioning as a failed attempt to catch Smith out.
Community verdict
2 VOTES
People in this story
SWIPE →
Senator who challenged Schmitt’s accusation and confirmed the Maryland game location
President mentioned in connection with Smith’s past investigative findings
Part of a bigger story
12 OUTLETSFormer special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee about his investigations of Donald Trump. Eric Schmitt questioned him about an alleged Atlanta basketball-game visit; Smith said he attended a different game. Left-leaning outlets portray Schmitt’s questioning as a failed attack built on an apparent mix-up, and stress that he continued defending his accusation. Center outlets focus on the basketball-game discrepancy while also covering the broader hearing about Smith’s investigations and subpoenas. Right-leaning outlets emphasize Republican challenges to Smith over his Trump investigations, while also recounting the disputed basketball-game allegation.
- ARTICLES
- 16
- OUTLETS
- 12
- AVG CRED
- 69
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…