Khanna, Massie Warn That AG Bondi Might Face Contempt of Congress Action for Not Releasing All Epstein Files
Khanna said the released records were incomplete and that he and Massie were preparing measures to hold Bondi accountable.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New American is an opinion-oriented publisher, and this article uses strongly evaluative language alongside reported material. The author is identified, but the text offers limited independent verification and does not establish a corrections record.
- Source type — Opinion-oriented publisher; a weaker prior than an established general-news outlet.
- Author attribution — An author is named, providing basic accountability.
- Editorial standards — The article mixes reporting with loaded characterizations and relies partly on quoted social-media posts.
- Correction history — No corrections practice or history is established in the article.
The article includes named lawmakers’ remarks and quotes Blanche’s explanation, along with references to CBS and Fox News reporting. However, it presents no direct response from Bondi, relies heavily on statements by the lawmakers and social-media posts, and uses opinionated language.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article mainly presents Massie’s and Khanna’s accusations and arguments. Blanche’s explanation and outside reporting appear, but Bondi’s own response and a fuller defense of the department’s position are absent.
- Counterarguments presented — Blanche’s explanation for the delay and redactions is included, but no response from Bondi is presented.
- Source diversity — The article draws on the two lawmakers, Blanche’s letter, and references to CBS and Fox News, but most quoted material supports the critics’ case.
- Loaded language — The writer uses openly evaluative phrasing, including “hate-Trump leftist” and “headmistress.”
- Omitted context — The article does not develop the department’s position beyond Blanche’s explanation or independently assess the disputed legal interpretations.
The article’s framing is critical of the Trump Justice Department but also uses distinctly right-coded language about the CBS host and the agency. Its presentation leans right in tone, while the central criticism is voiced by lawmakers from both parties.
- Language tone — The writer calls the host a “hate-Trump leftist” and uses other derisive phrasing.
- Framing — It frames the dispute around alleged concealment by the Trump Justice Department, while emphasizing bipartisan congressional criticism.
- Source selection — It relies chiefly on statements from Massie and Khanna, with a DOJ explanation and cited network reporting also included.
Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna said they are preparing to seek inherent contempt of Congress against Attorney General Pam Bondi over the Justice Department’s partial release of Epstein files. The dispute centers on whether the department has complied with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
Massie and Khanna said the Justice Department had not released all records required by the Epstein Files Transparency Act. They discussed seeking inherent contempt against Bondi, and Khanna said they were also assembling bipartisan support for daily fines.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said the department could not meet the deadline because of the volume of material and the need to review documents for redactions, and said the remaining files would be released on a rolling basis. Massie and Khanna disputed the department’s explanations and pointed to records they said were missing or redacted.
Community verdict
22 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 39
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative arguing that the Justice Department has withheld records and discussing contempt and impeachment efforts against Bondi
Representative arguing that the Justice Department has withheld records and discussing inherent contempt against Bondi
Massie's version of this story ↗Attorney general accused by Massie and Khanna of withholding required Epstein records and facing possible contempt action
Bondi's version of this story ↗Deputy attorney general who explained the Justice Department’s delay and redactions
President who signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act
Part of a bigger story
30 OUTLETSThe Justice Department released Epstein-related records in a partial, heavily redacted batch. Rep. Ro Khanna and Rep. Thomas Massie said they were preparing or considering inherent-contempt action against Attorney General Pam Bondi over the release. Left-leaning outlets frame Khanna’s push as accountability for redactions and omissions, with some questioning whether powerful people are being protected. Center outlets detail proposed congressional remedies and competing claims about legal compliance. Right-leaning outlets also stress the bipartisan push for fuller disclosure, often alongside the department’s defense.
- ARTICLES
- 39
- OUTLETS
- 30
- AVG CRED
- 63
- Cbc · Authorities were hot on the trail of Epstein's co-conspirators. Why weren't they named in the document dump?
- Daily Mail · Epstein docs bombshell exposes 10 possible coconspirators
- The Independent · Epstein survivors blast 'unacceptable' partial release of files as Congress members weigh legal options over DOJ's missed deadline
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






