'One of the greatest cover-ups in American history': Nancy Mace tells Piers Morgan he'd be 'shocked' by names in the Epstein files
Mace accused the Justice Department of concealing names in the Epstein files and failing to pursue alleged co-conspirators.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Independent is an established international news organization with editorial reporting and named bylines. The article attributes its central allegations to Mace and includes additional lawmakers' comments, though it offers limited independent evidence or a response from the Justice Department.
- Source type — Established international news outlet with a record of editorial reporting.
- Editorial standards — The story uses attributed quotations and distinguishes Mace's claims from reported facts.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Source diversity — It includes comments from lawmakers across parties, but no Justice Department response.
The story supplies concrete release figures and attributes its central claims to named lawmakers. Its account is limited by the absence of a Justice Department response or documentary evidence addressing Mace's accusations.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The story notes bipartisan objections to redactions and includes lawmakers' accounts of reviewing files. It does not include a response from the Justice Department or substantial evidence testing Mace's accusations.
- Counterarguments presented — It reports criticism from both parties but gives no Justice Department response.
- Source diversity — Several lawmakers are quoted or paraphrased, including Democrats and Republicans.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article attributes Mace's judgments rather than adopting them as its own.
- Omitted context — The basis for the redactions and the department's explanation are not presented.
The article reports Mace's accusations in direct quotations and uses attribution such as “claims,” while also noting bipartisan criticism of the redactions. Its framing does not clearly endorse a political side.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive and attributed, despite the charged quotations from Mace.
- Framing — Presents the comments as allegations and places them in the context of file access and redactions.
- Source selection — Includes lawmakers from both parties, though Mace's criticism dominates.
Representative Nancy Mace accused the Justice Department of concealing significant names in the Epstein files and failing to pursue alleged co-conspirators. Her comments came amid bipartisan criticism of redactions and congressional access to unredacted files.
In interviews with Piers Morgan and CNN, Nancy Mace said names in the unreleased or redacted Epstein files were shocking, called the redactions a major cover-up, and criticized the Justice Department's efforts to pursue alleged co-conspirators. She said she had reviewed the unredacted files and planned to return, while describing the document-viewing system as insulting and difficult to use.
The article says the department released more than three million files, including images and videos, and later made unredacted files available for members of Congress to review in person. It reports criticism of the redactions from lawmakers on both sides of the aisle, and notes that Jamie Raskin, Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie reviewed files. It also describes Attorney General Pam Bondi's contentious House Judiciary Committee appearance.
Community verdict
18 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 13
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →South Carolina representative criticizing the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files
Attorney General who appeared before the House Judiciary Committee
President whose legacy Bondi defended
Kentucky representative who reviewed the files
Maryland representative who reviewed the files
California representative who reviewed the files
Part of a bigger story
10 OUTLETSThe coverage reports that Rep. Nancy Mace reviewed Epstein-related files and is seeking further information about them. Center outlets frame the review as a push for more disclosure and scrutiny, varying in emphasis among her plans for testimony and records, a proposed task force, a request for an unredacted memorandum, and her concern that lawmakers may be monitored.
- ARTICLES
- 13
- OUTLETS
- 10
- AVG CRED
- 69
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…







