Durbin demands Schmitt records and an apology for Jack Smith
Durbin led Democrats’ demand for committee records and an apology to Jack Smith.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Hill is an established national news outlet, and this report identifies its author and attributes claims to the people and offices making them. The article also describes documents obtained by the newsroom and includes responses from both sides of the dispute.
- Source type — Established national news outlet with a record of political reporting.
- Transparency — Claims are attributed, and the report identifies the messages the newsroom obtained.
- Author attribution — The article names its reporter.
- Editorial standards — The outlet presents opposing responses, though the text does not establish its corrections practices.
The report uses a letter, text messages obtained by the newsroom, and responses from the senators’ offices to explain the dispute. It provides evidence relevant to Schmitt’s questioning and includes competing accounts, though it does not include direct interviews with the principals.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The report includes the Democrats’ demand and the documents at issue, as well as responses from Grassley’s and Schmitt’s offices. The principals do not appear to speak directly in the article, but the competing positions are represented.
- Counterarguments presented — Grassley’s spokeswoman rejects the apology demand, and Schmitt’s spokesperson explains his account of the texts.
- Source diversity — Includes a letter, messages obtained by the newsroom, and statements from both sides.
- Omitted context — The article does not include direct interviews with Schmitt, Durbin, or Smith.
- Loaded language — Some charged descriptions appear as attributed statements or descriptions of the controversy.
The article presents the Democrats’ allegations and the texts they cite, while also including responses from Grassley’s and Schmitt’s offices. Its framing is largely reportorial rather than overtly partisan.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive language, with the characterization of a confusing flub attributed to the events described.
- Source selection — Includes Democratic claims, text messages, and responses from Republican offices.
- Framing — Centers the dispute over committee records and Schmitt’s questioning without an explicit editorial verdict.
Senate Judiciary Democrats, led by Dick Durbin, demanded records and an apology after Sen. Eric Schmitt accused Jack Smith of perjury during a hearing. Texts obtained by The Hill do not name a team, and Schmitt’s office said he had not seen messages referencing Caitlin Clark.
Senate Judiciary Democrats said Republicans violated committee rules by withholding records related to Eric Schmitt’s questioning of Jack Smith. Dick Durbin’s letter demanded the records and an apology for what it called personal attacks and false accusations. Durbin also said the texts showed Schmitt had not verified a document before relying on it.
The Hill reported that the messages did not name a basketball team and showed prosecutors arranging to meet at halftime. Schmitt’s spokesperson said he had not seen texts referencing Caitlin Clark and that Schmitt had focused on the timing of the messages. A spokesperson for Chuck Grassley rejected the Democrats’ demand for an apology and said Smith owed one to Americans affected by his office’s work.
Community verdict
19 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 2
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 8 · ◆ 4 · ▼ 7
People in this story
SWIPE →Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member leading the Democrats’ letter
Senator whose questioning of Jack Smith prompted the Democrats’ demand
Schmitt's version of this story ↗Senate Judiciary Committee chair to whom Durbin’s letter was addressed
Senator who pressed Schmitt to show the text messages during the hearing
Part of a bigger story
2 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 2
- OUTLETS
- 2
- AVG CRED
- 79
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



