Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for CottonCongress / Members

Trump Doxxes GOP Senator's Cell Phone Number Amid Push To Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent

Cotton defended his opposition to permanent daylight saving time after Trump urged Arkansans to pressure him.

Trump Doxxes GOP Senator's Cell Phone Number Amid Push To Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent
Image · The Daily Caller

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityThe Daily Caller54/100 MEDIUM
This article1 analysis · Oct 5, 2026
tl;dr

Donald Trump posted Sen. Tom Cotton’s cellphone number and urged Arkansans to pressure him to advance the Sunshine Protection Act. Cotton defended his opposition to permanent daylight saving time, while the article notes the Senate was not due to resume business until after the midterm elections.

Community verdict

23 VOTES
How does this story look for
Tom Cotton R · AR · SEN
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Tom Cotton
R · AR · SEN

Arkansas senator whose opposition to the measure Trump criticized

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who posted Cotton’s cellphone number and urged calls to pressure him

Trump's version of this story ↗
Lindsey Graham
Former U.S. Senator (R-SC)

Former South Carolina senator mentioned in an account of Trump’s earlier disclosure of his phone number

Part of a bigger story

50 OUTLETS
Trump Presses Tom Cotton Over Permanent Daylight Saving Time Bill

Outlets agree that Trump urged people to contact Sen. Tom Cotton and posted a number he said belonged to Cotton as he pushed for permanent daylight saving time. Cotton opposes the change, citing dark winter mornings. Left-leaning outlets focus on Trump's public pressure and phone-number post, often presenting the disclosure as an inappropriate or ineffective tactic. Center outlets largely describe both sides' policy arguments and the phone-number episode. Right-leaning outlets often pair Trump's push with Cotton's winter-morning objection, though some portray Cotton as delaying action.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…