Talarico campaign asks court to unseal Paxton's depositions in energy investing dispute
Talarico’s campaign asked a court to make Paxton’s deposition transcripts public before the election.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates San Antonio Current, where this article appeared. The other scores rate the article itself.
The San Antonio Current is a local news outlet with a solid recorded rating, and the page attributes the reporting to The Texas Tribune. The article names its author and identifies its original publisher.
- Track record — The publisher's recorded rating is 71, based on 17 stories.
- Source type — The San Antonio Current is classified as local news; the article credits The Texas Tribune as its original publisher.
- Author attribution — The page names Kayla Guo and identifies her affiliation with The Texas Tribune.
- Transparency — The article explicitly states that it first appeared on The Texas Tribune.
The article gives a detailed account of the court petition, the underlying dispute and the campaign’s legal argument. It attributes the campaign’s claims and includes responses from Paxton’s spokesperson and a lawyer involved in the dispute, though the deposition transcripts themselves are not available in the article.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article explains the campaign’s case for unsealing the depositions and includes denials or counterarguments from Paxton’s spokesperson and a lawyer involved in the dispute. The transcripts are not available, so the underlying allegations cannot be independently assessed within the story.
- Counterarguments presented — Paxton’s spokesperson called the Journal’s reporting false, and a lawyer said there was no conflict and the records were not privileged.
- Source diversity — The story presents the campaign’s filing, a spokesperson’s response and a lawyer’s account.
- Omitted context — The article notes that it does not have the deposition transcripts, limiting direct examination of the central evidence.
- Loaded language — Most charged characterizations are quoted or attributed rather than stated as the article’s own conclusions.
The article uses largely neutral language and attributes the campaign’s allegations, Paxton’s spokesperson’s denial and the lawyer’s response. Its focus on the campaign’s petition does not by itself establish a discernible political lean.
- Language tone — The article primarily uses descriptive language and attributes evaluative claims to the people making them.
- Source selection — It includes statements from Talarico’s campaign, Paxton’s spokesperson and a lawyer involved in the dispute.
- Framing — The story centers on a court filing seeking public access to depositions, rather than endorsing a candidate.
Cites Texas Tribune
This article cites Texas Tribune as its original publisher. ChamberLight has not verified that it is a republication, so the scores are San Antonio Current's own.
18 stories · 79–82 · updated Oct 1, 2026
This is Texas Tribune's own score. The Source Check scores are for San Antonio Current and this article.
James Talarico’s campaign asked a court to unseal depositions Ken Paxton gave in a securities-fraud dispute, arguing that Texans should see the testimony before the Senate election. Paxton’s spokesperson called earlier reporting about the deposition false, while a lawyer involved in the case disputed that the records were privileged.
Talarico’s campaign filed a petition in Collin County seeking to unseal Paxton’s 2019 and 2022 depositions in a dispute involving Paxton, his financial adviser and former business associates. The campaign argued that the testimony raises questions about Paxton’s fitness for office and that public access is warranted because of its potential effect on public office and government.
Community verdict
10 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Senate candidate whose campaign petitioned to unseal Paxton’s depositions
Senate candidate whose past depositions are the subject of the unsealing petition
Paxton's version of this story ↗Part of a bigger story
8 OUTLETSTalarico’s campaign asked a court to unseal depositions Ken Paxton gave in a securities dispute, arguing voters should be able to review them before the Senate election. Left-leaning outlets frame the request as transparency for voters, with Daily Kos taking a more openly approving tone. Center outlets place the filing in the Senate race context and also track polling and Paxton’s vulnerabilities. Right-leaning outlets frame Talarico’s puppy-themed criticism of Paxton’s animal-welfare record as a campaign-messaging contest.
- ARTICLES
- 8
- OUTLETS
- 8
- AVG CRED
- 72
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…
