Skip to main content
4 min read
◆ Mixed look for HegsethDefense / Military

Mark Kelly, Other Democrats Trot Out New, Mind-Numbingly Stupid Hoax Against Pete Hegseth

Hegseth used “no quarter, no mercy” while describing the U.S. response to its enemies.

Mark Kelly, Other Democrats Trot Out New, Mind-Numbingly Stupid Hoax Against Pete Hegseth
Image · redstate.com

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityredstate.com43/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Oct 9, 2026
Mar 14, 2026
tl;dr

RedState columnist Bonchie argues that Mark Kelly, Jason Crow and Eugene Vindman wrongly characterized Pete Hegseth’s “no quarter” remarks as an illegal order. The article quotes the lawmakers’ objections and frames them as a partisan attack on Hegseth.

Community verdict

8 VOTES
How does this story look for
Pete Hegseth R · Secretary of Defense
● OPEN

People in this story

SWIPE →
Pete Hegseth
R · Secretary of Defense

Secretary of Defense whose press-conference remarks prompted the criticism

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Jason Crow
D · CO-6

Representative criticizing Hegseth’s remarks

Crow's version of this story ↗

Representative and former Army JAG criticizing Hegseth’s remarks

Vindman's version of this story ↗
Mark Kelly
D · AZ · SEN

Senator criticizing Hegseth’s “no quarter” remarks

Kelly's version of this story ↗
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President mentioned in connection with Iran and Kelly’s earlier criticism of alleged presidential orders

Part of a bigger story

4 OUTLETS
Mark Kelly Criticizes Pete Hegseth’s “No Quarter” Remarks

Hegseth used no-quarter language while describing the U.S. response to Iran, and Mark Kelly and other lawmakers criticized the remarks as potentially illegal. Center outlets focus on the legal implications and possible risks to service members, while noting Hegseth issued no direct order and an expert viewed the language as possible hyperbole. Right-leaning outlets portray the criticism as partisan or overstated and direct criticism toward Kelly and the lawmakers.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…