Mark Kelly, Other Democrats Trot Out New, Mind-Numbingly Stupid Hoax Against Pete Hegseth
Vindman argued that an order to give no quarter would violate the law of war and said service members must follow that law.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRedState is an opinion-oriented outlet, and this piece is explicitly argumentative rather than an independently sourced report. The author is named and includes lawmakers’ posts, but offers little corroboration or independent legal analysis.
- Source type — Opinion outlet; strong prior for viewpoint-driven presentation.
- Source diversity — Quotes lawmakers’ public statements but does not seek independent legal or military expertise.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Editorial standards — The piece is clearly opinionated and gives little evidence of a fact-checking or corrections process.
The article reproduces lawmakers’ statements and Hegseth’s remarks, but its central legal interpretation is asserted by the columnist without independent legal sourcing or a substantive response from the lawmakers.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes the lawmakers’ claims, but the columnist’s presentation overwhelmingly rejects them and gives no independent legal analysis or meaningful reply from the lawmakers.
- Loaded language — Repeatedly uses dismissive descriptions such as hoax, stupid and manufactured nonsense.
- Counterarguments presented — The lawmakers’ arguments are quoted, but no independent explanation of the legal standard is provided.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an opinion column and makes its verdict explicit.
- Source diversity — Relies on quoted political statements and the author’s interpretation.
The author uses dismissive language toward Democrats and strongly endorses Hegseth’s interpretation, presenting the lawmakers’ criticism as a hoax and manufactured nonsense.
- Language tone — Calls the criticism a hoax and describes it as dumb, overwrought and stupid.
- Framing — Frames the lawmakers’ objections as a coordinated partisan attack and Hegseth’s remarks as generic resolve.
- Source selection — Quotes the lawmakers but offers no independent legal expert or substantive response from them.
RedState columnist Bonchie argues that Mark Kelly, Jason Crow and Eugene Vindman wrongly characterized Pete Hegseth’s “no quarter” remarks as an illegal order. The article quotes the lawmakers’ objections and frames them as a partisan attack on Hegseth.
The article says Hegseth used the phrase “no quarter, no mercy for our enemies” during a press conference. It quotes Eugene Vindman and Mark Kelly arguing that an order to give no quarter would violate the law of war, and Jason Crow calling the phrase a war crime and Hegseth’s remarks reckless and dangerous.
Bonchie contends Hegseth was using a common expression to signal resolve, not ordering troops to execute prisoners. The columnist describes the lawmakers’ criticism as manufactured and invites them to pursue impeachment if they believe Hegseth issued an illegal order.
Community verdict
6 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Representative and former Army JAG criticizing Hegseth’s remarks
Secretary of Defense whose press-conference remarks prompted the criticism
Hegseth's version of this story ↗Senator criticizing Hegseth’s “no quarter” remarks
Kelly's version of this story ↗President mentioned in connection with Iran and Kelly’s earlier criticism of alleged presidential orders
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




