Lee Zeldin Goes Scorched Earth With Blistering Response to Jasmine Crockett's Absurd Epstein Claim
Crockett cited donations to Republicans while defending Stacey Plaskett, and the article argues that her claim confused two people with the same name.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRedState is a partisan, opinion-forward publisher rather than a newspaper of record. This piece identifies its author and links to supporting material, but presents a sharply one-sided argument and does not include Crockett’s response.
- Source type — Opinion-first partisan outlet; this is an explicitly slanted commentary piece.
- Editorial standards — The piece relies partly on linked reporting and a social-media post, but offers little independent corroboration in the text.
- Author attribution — The article names an author.
- Source selection — The article criticizes Crockett without including her response to the claim.
The article identifies the competing namesake explanation and quotes Zeldin’s response, but relies on a narrow set of sources, offers limited verification in the text, and does not include Crockett’s response. Its argumentative language further limits its value as balanced reporting.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This opinion piece adopts a critical view of Crockett and a favorable view of Zeldin. It gives little space to Crockett’s perspective or to independent verification beyond the cited material.
- Counterarguments presented — Crockett’s response to the reported error is not included.
- Loaded language — The author uses repeated insults and condemnatory phrasing about Crockett.
- Opinion vs reporting — The author openly endorses Zeldin’s position and argues that Crockett does not care about the truth.
- Source diversity — The article references Zeldin, a social-media post, and a New York Post report, but offers no direct response from Crockett.
The article uses strongly disparaging language about Crockett and portrays Zeldin’s response sympathetically. Its framing also characterizes the Democrats’ Epstein-related push as an effort to harm Trump.
- Language tone — Uses terms such as “idiocy,” “slimy,” and “pathological antics” about Crockett.
- Framing — Presents the Democrats’ effort as backfiring and Zeldin as righteously aggrieved.
- Source selection — Features Zeldin’s response and a supporting social-media post, without Crockett’s response.
Rep. Jasmine Crockett argued on the House floor that Republicans had received donations from Jeffrey Epstein; EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said the donation to him came from a different person with the same name. The article criticizes Crockett’s claim and recounts her possible Senate run.
The article says Crockett defended Rep. Stacey Plaskett on the House floor and cited donations to Republicans from someone named Jeffrey Epstein. It reports that the donations to Zeldin were from a physician with the same name, and that those donations came after the notorious Jeffrey Epstein died. Zeldin responded that the physician was a different person and wrote, “NO FREAKIN RELATION YOU GENIUS!!!” The article presents Crockett’s claim as wrong and sharply criticizes her.
The article also says Crockett was considering a Senate run, planned to decide by Thanksgiving, and would wait until the December 8 filing deadline to announce after reviewing commissioned polling.
Community verdict
10 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 34
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 25% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative whose House-floor remarks about donations to Republicans are challenged in the article
EPA administrator who responded to Crockett’s remarks about a donation to his prior campaign
Zeldin's version of this story ↗President mentioned as the political target of the Democrats’ Epstein-related effort
Delegate whom Crockett defended, and whom the article says had received donations from Jeffrey Epstein
Part of a bigger story
20 OUTLETSCrockett named a Jeffrey Epstein as a donor to Lee Zeldin during a House speech; outlets on multiple sides report that the donor was a different person with the same name. She later said she had not meant the convicted sex offender. Left-leaning outlets focus on Crockett's mistaken identification and the criticism it drew. Center outlets likewise stress the error and Zeldin's rebuttal, with some articles also recounting her explanation or later reversal. Right-leaning outlets also stress the error, but more often present it as a political failure and her defense as inadequate.
- ARTICLES
- 34
- OUTLETS
- 20
- AVG CRED
- 53
- Yahoo News · Alan Dershowitz Compares 'Liar' Jasmine Crockett to Joseph McCarthy for Naming Wrong Epstein as GOP Donor
- New York Post · Jasmine Crockett is on a cringe streak, and I'm here for it
- redstate.com · Dr. Jeffrey Epstein Has Perfect Response to This Dem's Misleading Use of His Donation to Zeldin
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



