Skip to main content
2 min read
● InformationalElections / Campaigns

Crockett Weighs in on the Colbert/Talarico Controversy - This Promises to Get Juicy

Crockett says she is waiting for Paramount’s statement before making a formal response to the interview controversy.

Crockett Weighs in on the Colbert/Talarico Controversy - This Promises to Get Juicy
Image · redstate.com

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityredstate.com43/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Oct 10, 2026
Feb 18, 2026
tl;dr

RedState argues that James Talarico’s claim that the FCC and Donald Trump stopped his Stephen Colbert interview was contradicted by CBS, which said the show had options under the equal-time rule. The article says Jasmine Crockett is waiting for a statement from Paramount before responding formally.

Community verdict

VOTING CLOSED
How does this story look for
Jasmine Crockett D · TX-30
NOT RATEDCLOSED

No good or bad look here

This story reports what happened without casting Crockett in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Crockett’s record.

● INFORMATIONAL

People in this story

SWIPE →

Texas Senate candidate responding to the dispute over the Colbert interview

PRIMARY SUBJECT

Texas Senate candidate whose interview and claims about the FCC are at the center of the dispute

Talarico's version of this story ↗
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President accused by Talarico of interfering with the interview

Part of a bigger story

13 OUTLETS
Jasmine Crockett Comments on CBS’s Colbert Interview Decision

CBS did not broadcast James Talarico’s interview with Stephen Colbert; it was posted online, and Rep. Jasmine Crockett commented on the decision and its effect on her primary rival. Center outlets emphasize Crockett’s view that the controversy boosted Talarico and its place in the primary race. Right-leaning outlets focus on whether CBS’s equal-time guidance, rather than government pressure, explains the interview’s absence, often challenging claims of censorship.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…