A 4:52 Filing; a 5:00 Withdrawal - Hours Later Steve Daines Confirms He's Done
Daines withdrew from the Senate race and later confirmed he would not seek reelection, endorsing Kurt Alme as his preferred successor.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRedState is an opinion-oriented, ideologically identifiable publisher, which lowers confidence in institutional neutrality. The article names its author and refers to state candidate records and public statements, but the text gives limited detail for independently checking its account.
- Source type — Opinion-oriented publisher with an explicit partisan framing in the page's editor's note.
- Transparency — The article attributes the withdrawal to state records and identifies statements by Daines and Alme, but provides little additional sourcing detail.
- Author attribution — A named author is identified.
The article attributes key developments to candidate records and statements, and includes direct quotes. It is a brief account with limited independent sourcing or outside perspective, and the page includes overtly partisan promotional material.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article gives an account of the filing and withdrawal and includes statements from Daines and Alme, but it offers no independent or opposing perspective. The story is narrow and largely factual, though the partisan editor's note weakens the overall balance.
- Source diversity — The account relies on candidate records and statements from the two Republicans involved, without other sources.
- Counterarguments presented — No counterarguments or contrasting perspectives appear.
- Loaded language — The article itself is mostly restrained, while the attached editor's note uses partisan language.
- Opinion vs reporting — A largely report-like account is accompanied by an explicitly opinionated editor's note.
The reporting of the race developments is mostly straightforward, but the page's editor's note uses explicitly partisan language attacking mainstream media and referring to a blue-state fraud narrative.
- Language tone — The editor's note calls mainstream media uninterested in facts and promotes a partisan fraud narrative.
- Framing — The article presents a Republican candidate's entry and an endorsement without a contrasting political perspective.
- Headline — The headline emphasizes Daines's withdrawal in dramatic terms but does not itself make a clear partisan argument.
Montana U.S. Attorney Kurt Alme filed to run for the Senate shortly before the filing deadline, after Sen. Steve Daines had withdrawn from the race. Daines later confirmed he would not seek reelection and endorsed Alme.
State candidate records showed that Daines withdrew shortly before Montana’s 5 p.m. filing deadline. Later that evening, he publicly confirmed he would not seek reelection, saying he had decided after careful thought about his future. He had previously served in the House and Senate for 13 years.
Daines endorsed Alme, who confirmed he would run for the seat and seek the Republican nomination. Alme said he was proud to launch his campaign and emphasized public safety and the rule of law.
Community verdict
22 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 44
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Montana senator who withdrew from reelection and endorsed Kurt Alme
Part of a bigger story
23 OUTLETSDaines withdrew from his reelection bid shortly before Montana’s filing deadline. Kurt Alme entered the race around the deadline, and Daines endorsed him as his preferred successor. Left-leaning outlets focus on whether Daines’s timing and endorsement narrowed the primary or kept potential recruits out. Center outlets mainly recount the exit, Alme’s entry and endorsements, while also reporting claims about the effect on competition. Right-leaning outlets generally pair Daines’s departure with his support for Alme, though their coverage also includes criticism of the timing.
- ARTICLES
- 44
- OUTLETS
- 23
- AVG CRED
- 71
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

