Election 2026: The race to represent the 9th Congressional District
Wallace outlined her positions on costs, data centers and political violence in answers to questions for the congressional race.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Reading Eagle is an established regional newspaper with a named reporter and a transparent local-news format. This article primarily presents candidates’ own questionnaire responses rather than independently verifying their claims.
- Source type — Established local-news publisher; regional reporting is the paper’s core role.
- Author attribution — A named reporter is credited.
- Transparency — The article identifies its questions and presents the candidates’ answers as responses.
- Editorial standards — The format gives both candidates space to address the same questions, though the answers are not independently checked in the article.
The article provides comparable, attributable responses from both candidates and basic race context. Its policy claims are largely presented without independent verification, supporting detail or outside perspectives.
HOW WE SCORE ↗Both candidates receive space to answer the same questions, but the article does not independently test their claims or include outside perspectives.
- Source diversity — Both candidates are included, but the article relies mainly on their own statements.
- Counterarguments presented — The candidates give contrasting views, but neither responds directly to a systematic examination of the other’s claims.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article reports attributed answers rather than endorsing them.
- Omitted context — The claims receive little independent evidence or fact-checking.
The piece uses a candidate-questionnaire format, gives both candidates the same questions and presents their responses with attribution. No clear editorial preference is evident.
- Framing — Both candidates are presented as competitors answering the same set of questions.
- Source selection — The candidates’ own answers are the central sources, with both represented.
- Language tone — The narration is straightforward and does not use evident partisan or evaluative language.
Democrat Rachel Wallace and Republican incumbent Dan Meuser answered questions about costs, data centers and political violence as they compete for Pennsylvania’s 9th Congressional District seat. Their responses set out contrasting policy positions ahead of the Nov. 3 election.
The Reading Eagle asked Rachel Wallace and Dan Meuser the same three questions about economic concerns, data centers and political violence. Wallace said she would oppose blanket tariffs, support local authority over data-center development and work to lower costs; she also criticized Meuser’s position on local control.
Meuser discussed the Trump administration’s energy policies, housing legislation and the Ratepayer Protection Act, saying data-center developers should address energy and water use and that local communities should make final decisions. He also recalled the Butler, Pennsylvania, attack and called on leaders to condemn political violence.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Wallace in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Wallace’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Democratic candidate for Pennsylvania’s 9th Congressional District
Republican incumbent representing Pennsylvania’s 9th Congressional District
Meuser's version of this story ↗President of the United States; referenced in Meuser’s answers
Former president, mentioned in Meuser’s account of energy policy
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


