Jimmy Kimmel rips into Trump admin over 'deeply disturbing' scandal about 'spying' on Dems
A photograph of Bondi’s notes prompted allegations that officials tracked Jayapal’s searches.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story is an established digital news outlet that identifies an author, but its politically opinionated presentation warrants a more moderate score than a newspaper of record. This short report relies heavily on a television host’s account and does not include a response from the Attorney General or the Justice Department.
- Source type — National digital news outlet with a recognizable publication, though its coverage often uses a pronounced political frame.
- Editorial standards — The available article offers limited independent verification of its central allegation.
- Author attribution — The article identifies an author.
- Source selection — It quotes Kimmel and Johnson but gives no response from Bondi or the Justice Department.
The report describes the photographed notes and attributes the allegation of tracking and its interpretation to Kimmel. Johnson’s response provides a second perspective, but the article offers little independent verification and no comment from Bondi or the Justice Department.
HOW WE SCORE ↗Kimmel’s accusation and criticism dominate the article. Johnson offers a limited response, but there is no account from Bondi or the Justice Department and no independent confirmation of how the notes were made or used.
- Counterarguments presented — Johnson calls the tracking inappropriate and guesses it was an oversight; no response from Bondi or DOJ appears.
- Source diversity — The report relies primarily on Kimmel’s monologue and a short statement from Johnson.
- Omitted context — The article does not independently establish who created the notes or whether they were used as alleged.
- Loaded language — The most charged descriptions are presented as Kimmel’s words, while the headline adopts scandal-oriented framing.
The story foregrounds Kimmel’s criticism of the Trump administration and uses a headline that frames the incident as a scandal about spying. It includes Johnson’s response, but mainly to present Kimmel’s rebuttal.
- Headline — The headline emphasizes Kimmel’s attack and characterizes the matter as a scandal about spying.
- Framing — The report centers Kimmel’s interpretation of the notes as abuse of power.
- Source selection — Kimmel’s statements receive extensive quotation; Bondi and the Justice Department are not heard from.
- Language tone — The article repeats critical language from Kimmel while its own narration remains relatively restrained.
Jimmy Kimmel criticized the Trump administration after notes attributed to Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared to list searches Representative Pramila Jayapal made in the Epstein files. House Speaker Mike Johnson called the tracking inappropriate but guessed it was an oversight.
The article reports that a photograph of Bondi’s notes from a House Judiciary Committee hearing appeared to show Jayapal’s search history from a private room where members of Congress could review less-redacted Epstein files. Kimmel alleged that administration officials tracked members’ searches without their knowledge and used the information to give Bondi an advantage at the hearing.
Kimmel criticized Johnson’s suggestion that the tracking was an oversight. Johnson said he did not think anyone should be tracking the searches and said he would raise the issue with the Justice Department. The article does not include a response from Bondi or the department.
Community verdict
17 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 21
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: 23% good look
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 3 · ◆ 4 · ▼ 10
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative whose searches of the Epstein files reportedly appeared in Bondi’s notes
Jayapal's version of this story ↗Speaker of the House who characterized the tracking as an oversight
President whose administration is criticized
Part of a bigger story
17 OUTLETSPam Bondi faced questions from House Judiciary Committee members about the Justice Department’s handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related files and defended the department during heated exchanges. Left-leaning outlets stress criticism of Bondi’s handling of the files and, in some coverage, concern that lawmakers’ searches were used against them. Center outlets focus on specific exchanges and lawmakers’ allegations about redactions and disclosures, with several articles sharply critical of Bondi. Right-leaning outlets present the hearing as disorderly clashes with Democrats, with some casting their questioning as partisan and praising Bondi’s responses.
- ARTICLES
- 21
- OUTLETS
- 17
- AVG CRED
- 63
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





