Grassley under the gun over hidden docs behind botched attack on Jack Smith
Democrats accused Grassley of withholding committee records related to the hearing about Jack Smith.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRaw Story publishes a bylined report and attributes key details to Politico and named participants. Its framing is notably adversarial, and the short article offers limited independent sourcing or documentary detail.
- Source type — An established online news publisher, though its reporting and framing can be politically partisan.
- Source selection — The report attributes the letter to Politico and includes a response from Grassley’s spokesperson.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Editorial standards — The brief report provides little information about independent verification or documentary support.
The report attributes the Democrats’ allegations to their letter and includes a response from Grassley’s spokesperson. It relies substantially on Politico’s reporting and provides little direct documentary evidence or additional context.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents the Democrats’ account in detail and includes Grassley’s spokesperson’s opposing response, but does not provide much independent verification or additional context.
- Counterarguments presented — Grassley’s spokesperson responds, but the article does not give a detailed explanation from Grassley or his committee.
- Source diversity — The report relies on the Democrats’ letter, Politico’s account and a spokesperson’s statement.
- Loaded language — The headline and narrative use critical descriptions of the hearing episode.
- Omitted context — The report supplies little independent context about the documents or the committee’s handling of them.
The headline and narrative use critical language about Grassley and Schmitt, while foregrounding Democrats’ allegations. A brief response from Grassley’s spokesperson is included.
- Language tone — Calls Schmitt’s conduct embarrassing and foregrounds the Democrats’ characterization of the claims as baseless.
- Source selection — The report gives substantial space to Democrats’ letter and includes one short response from Grassley’s spokesperson.
- Headline — Describes the episode as a “botched attack” and Grassley as “under the gun.”
Democrats accuse Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley of withholding records before a hearing where Sen. Eric Schmitt made claims about Jack Smith. Grassley’s spokesperson defended the committee and said Smith owed an apology.
A letter led by Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Dick Durbin says Democrats did not receive materials Sen. Eric Schmitt used at a hearing. Schmitt had suggested Jack Smith secretly attended an Atlanta basketball game to meet prosecutors working on the Georgia election case against Donald Trump; Smith denied the claim. Democrats said the texts did not support Schmitt’s allegation and that the episode disrupted the committee’s work.
The Democrats’ letter asked Grassley to provide withheld committee records, comply with Senate rules and apologize to Smith. Grassley’s spokesperson responded that Smith owed an apology to Americans who, the spokesperson said, had been mistreated by Smith and his staff.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Grassley in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Grassley’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Senate Judiciary Committee chair accused by Democrats of withholding records
President referenced in connection with the Georgia election case
Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member who led the Democrats’ letter
Senator whose claims about Jack Smith at a committee hearing prompted the Democrats’ letter
Senator who cited a readout at the hearing
Part of a bigger story
5 OUTLETSSenate Judiciary Democrats asked Chuck Grassley to apologize to Jack Smith and provide committee records related to Eric Schmitt’s claim about Smith attending a basketball game. Left-leaning outlets center the apology and records demand and characterize Schmitt’s claim as mistaken; one article also scrutinizes Grassley’s response. Center outlets report the same request, while one gives more emphasis to Grassley’s defense of his handling of records.
- ARTICLES
- 6
- OUTLETS
- 5
- AVG CRED
- 72
- The Hill · Grassley defends record after attacks from Democrats over Jack Smith treatment
- Raw Story · Chuck Grassley fires back at Democrats over Jack Smith – but leaves out one glaring detail
- Washington Examiner · Committee Democrats push Grassley for apology and records related to Schmitt’s Jack Smith perjury flub
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




