Donald Trump, 79, Mistakenly Declaring Sitting Senator 'No Longer' in Office
Tillis’s opposition to Warsh’s nomination prompted Trump’s inaccurate statement about his Senate status.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYRadarOnline identifies an author and publishes attributed quotations, but its tabloid-oriented reputation and limited visible evidence make it less dependable than established national newsrooms. The short report offers little sourcing beyond quoted remarks and assertions.
- Source type — Recorded as a national news publisher, but the outlet’s tabloid focus tempers that positive signal.
- Editorial standards — The story provides limited visible support for claims beyond attributed statements.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Transparency — The article identifies the people involved and quotes them, but gives little additional reporting detail.
The story includes direct quotations from Trump and Tillis and explains the committee deadlock and the stated reason for Tillis’s opposition. It offers limited independent sourcing or detail about the Justice Department investigation and does not include a response from the department.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Trump’s remarks and Tillis’s explanation, along with the procedural context. Its account of the Justice Department investigation relies on Tillis and Powell’s allies, with no department response or independent account of the allegations.
- Source diversity — The report quotes the central figures but does not include an independent expert or the Justice Department’s response.
- Counterarguments presented — Trump’s remarks and Tillis’s rationale for opposing the nominee are both included.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is presented as reporting, though its headline emphasizes Trump’s error.
- Omitted context — The investigation’s evidence and the department’s account are not described.
The report uses a critical framing of Trump’s inaccurate remark, including the headline’s emphasis on his mistake, but otherwise presents attributed statements and procedural context without sustained partisan argument.
- Headline — The headline foregrounds Trump’s error in describing Tillis’s status.
- Language tone — The story calls the statement a slip-up and says Trump appeared to confuse Tillis’s status.
- Source selection — It includes statements from both Trump and Tillis, along with context about the investigation.
- Framing — The report centers on Trump’s inaccurate remark rather than making a broader partisan argument.
Donald Trump incorrectly suggested Sen. Thom Tillis was no longer in office after Tillis opposed Kevin Warsh’s Federal Reserve nomination. Tillis remains a senator and says he is objecting because of the Justice Department’s investigation of Fed Chair Jerome Powell.
During remarks to reporters, Trump said Tillis was “no longer a senator” after Tillis pledged to block Warsh’s nomination to chair the Federal Reserve. Tillis remains in office, and Trump later acknowledged that he is still a senator while saying Tillis could delay Warsh’s confirmation until 2027. The Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee is deadlocked over the nomination.
Tillis said he would not seek reelection in 2026 and described himself as willing to embrace bipartisanship and independent thinking. He said his opposition to Warsh is tied to the Justice Department’s investigation of Powell, whom Tillis described as facing an investigation based on committee testimony that showed no criminal intent. The article says Powell and his allies argue the probe reflects political pressure from Trump.
Community verdict
2 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 5
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: 50% good look
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →President who said Tillis was no longer a senator
Trump's version of this story ↗Defense secretary whom Tillis has criticized
Federal Reserve chair nominee
Homeland Security secretary whom Tillis has criticized
Federal Reserve chair under Justice Department investigation
Part of a bigger story
5 OUTLETSTrump incorrectly described Senator Thom Tillis as no longer in office after Tillis opposed Kevin Warsh’s Federal Reserve chair nomination. Tillis remains a senator and says his objection is tied to the Justice Department’s inquiry into Fed Chair Jerome Powell. Left-leaning outlets split between framing Trump’s remark as confusion about Tillis’s status and spotlighting Tillis’s sarcastic reply to Trump’s insult. Center outlets also split: one focuses on Trump’s inaccurate status claim, while the other reports Trump’s criticism after Tillis called for Kristi Noem to step down.
- ARTICLES
- 5
- OUTLETS
- 5
- AVG CRED
- 54
- The Mary Sue · This North Carolina Senator has a cheeky response to Trump calling him a 'loser', and it is hilarious
- Crooks and Liars · Grandpa Sundowner Confused About Sitting Senator
- The Independent · Republicans snipe back at Trump calling them 'losers' with zinger that it makes them qualified to be Homeland secretary
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…







