Sen. Kelly Is SHOCKED That 'No One Is Above the Law' Includes Him – PJ Media
Hegseth says Kelly's statements violated military rules and announced formal disciplinary action against him.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYPJ Media is an opinion-oriented publisher, and this article is openly argumentative rather than a reported account with independently presented sourcing. It identifies its author and quotes the principal figures, but does not provide an opposing independent source or documentation for several assertions.
- Source type — Opinion-oriented outlet; its perspective is apparent in the article's framing.
- Source diversity — It quotes Kelly and Hegseth but offers no independent expert or institutional response.
- Author attribution — The article names Matt Margolis as its author.
- Editorial standards — The opinion format and strongly partisan language provide limited evidence of neutral editorial controls in this piece.
The article provides a specific account of the disciplinary steps and quotes both Hegseth and Kelly. However, it is one-sided in its analysis, treats disputed claims about the legality of orders as settled, and supplies little independent evidence or legal context.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes Kelly's response, but its narration and conclusion endorse the department's rationale. It presents little independent legal analysis or counterargument to Hegseth's claims.
- Counterarguments presented — Kelly's claim of political intimidation is quoted, but the article rejects it without an independent response or deeper examination.
- Loaded language — The headline and narration use openly derisive, evaluative language about Kelly and Democrats.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is explicitly opinion and argues that Kelly should be held accountable.
- Source diversity — The account relies on Hegseth's statements and Kelly's response, with no independent legal or military perspective.
The article strongly favors Hegseth's action and criticizes Kelly and Democrats, describing their position as a partisan attack and presenting the proceedings as straightforward accountability.
- Language tone — Uses dismissive and judgmental wording about Democrats and Kelly, including that he is 'learning the hard way.'
- Framing — Frames the disciplinary action as enforcing a principle Democrats apply selectively.
- Omission — Does not develop a legal or independent counterargument to the department's position.
- Headline — The headline mocks Kelly's response and signals a critical stance.
The Defense Department initiated disciplinary proceedings against Sen. Mark Kelly over statements urging service members to refuse orders he characterized as illegal. Kelly called the action political intimidation, while the article argues that his status as a senator does not exempt him from accountability.
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said the Department of Defense initiated formal disciplinary action against Sen. Mark Kelly over public statements made from June through December 2025. Hegseth said Kelly characterized lawful military operations as illegal and counseled service members to refuse lawful orders. The article says the department also issued Kelly a formal Letter of Censure and began proceedings that could affect his retired rank and pay.
Kelly said the action was intended to intimidate retired servicemembers who criticize the government and vowed to fight it. The article says Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers had urged military members to refuse orders they called illegal, and asserts that they did not identify such orders. It presents the proceedings as an application of the principle that no one is above the law.
Community verdict
24 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 40
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Secretary of Defense who announced and initiated disciplinary proceedings against Kelly
Senator facing Defense Department disciplinary proceedings over his statements about military orders
Kelly's version of this story ↗President discussed as the subject of Kelly's and other Democrats' criticism
Part of a bigger story
38 OUTLETSOutlets report that Hegseth issued a censure to Sen. Mark Kelly and opened proceedings that could reduce his retired military rank or pay. The action followed Kelly’s participation in a video urging service members to refuse unlawful orders. Left-leaning outlets largely cast the action as punishment for Kelly’s speech and a bid to silence him. Center outlets emphasize the censure and possible consequences while presenting Kelly’s response and, in some reports, legal or political questions. Right-leaning outlets, especially PJ Media, frame the proceedings as accountability for statements they portray as harmful to military discipline.
- ARTICLES
- 40
- OUTLETS
- 38
- AVG CRED
- 72
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


