Skip to main content
3 min read

Sen. Kelly Is SHOCKED That 'No One Is Above the Law' Includes Him – PJ Media

Hegseth says Kelly's statements violated military rules and announced formal disciplinary action against him.

Sen. Kelly Is SHOCKED That 'No One Is Above the Law' Includes Him – PJ Media
Image · pjmedia.com

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilitypjmedia.com42/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Oct 12, 2026
Jan 5, 2026
tl;dr

The Defense Department initiated disciplinary proceedings against Sen. Mark Kelly over statements urging service members to refuse orders he characterized as illegal. Kelly called the action political intimidation, while the article argues that his status as a senator does not exempt him from accountability.

Community verdict

24 VOTES
How does this story look for
Pete Hegseth R · Secretary of Defense

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 40

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Pete Hegseth
R · Secretary of Defense

Secretary of Defense who announced and initiated disciplinary proceedings against Kelly

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Mark Kelly
D · AZ · SEN

Senator facing Defense Department disciplinary proceedings over his statements about military orders

Kelly's version of this story ↗
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President discussed as the subject of Kelly's and other Democrats' criticism

Part of a bigger story

38 OUTLETS
Hegseth Censures Sen. Mark Kelly Over Troop-Orders Video

Outlets report that Hegseth issued a censure to Sen. Mark Kelly and opened proceedings that could reduce his retired military rank or pay. The action followed Kelly’s participation in a video urging service members to refuse unlawful orders. Left-leaning outlets largely cast the action as punishment for Kelly’s speech and a bid to silence him. Center outlets emphasize the censure and possible consequences while presenting Kelly’s response and, in some reports, legal or political questions. Right-leaning outlets, especially PJ Media, frame the proceedings as accountability for statements they portray as harmful to military discipline.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…