Jasmine Crockett Proves (Again) That Democrats Have No Shame
Crockett accused Republicans of receiving money from someone named Jeffrey Epstein and later defended the claim in a CNN interview.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYPJ Media is an opinion-oriented publisher, and this page is an explicitly argumentative column rather than independent straight reporting. The author is named and the piece includes interview quotations, but its highly evaluative framing and limited sourcing constrain confidence in its institutional credibility.
- Source type — Opinion publisher and explicitly argumentative column.
- Author attribution — A named author is identified.
- Editorial standards — The text provides little information about corrections or editorial standards.
- Source selection — Includes quoted CNN interview remarks and embedded statements, but offers limited independent corroboration.
The article supplies quotations from Crockett and the interviewer and gives context for the censure vote, but relies mainly on an interview exchange and the author's own conclusions. Its strongly argumentative language and limited independent verification reduce its reporting quality.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece quotes Crockett's explanation but repeatedly rejects it in the author's own voice and offers no independent response or fuller examination of her account. The headline and narration are openly condemnatory.
- Loaded language — The headline and narration use strongly disparaging language about Crockett and Democrats.
- Counterarguments presented — Crockett's explanation is quoted, but the column does not develop or independently assess it.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article is an opinion column and repeatedly states the author's negative verdict.
- Source diversity — The account centers on one interview and the author's interpretation, with little independent sourcing.
The column frames Crockett and Democrats in strongly condemnatory terms and presents the episode as evidence of Democratic dishonesty. Its loaded language and one-sided framing indicate a strong rightward lean.
- Language tone — Uses terms such as “humiliating faceplant,” “bogus accusation,” and “absolute fool.”
- Framing — Frames the episode as an example of Democrats having “no shame.”
- Source selection — Relies on the interview exchange and the author's interpretation, without presenting a countervailing account beyond Crockett's own defense.
PJ Media criticizes Representative Jasmine Crockett for repeating an accusation that Republicans received money from someone named Jeffrey Epstein and declining to correct it after a CNN interview. Crockett said she had not identified which Jeffrey Epstein appeared in campaign records.
The article says Crockett named several Republicans on the House floor as having received money from “somebody named Jeffrey Epstein.” In a later CNN interview, she said she had not claimed the donor was the infamous sex offender and argued that her team had little time to verify the donor’s identity. The article characterizes her response as doubling down rather than correcting the record.
The article contrasts Crockett’s comments with Delegate Stacey Plaskett’s texting with Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing, which it describes as the matter behind Plaskett’s censure vote. Crockett agreed with the interviewer that Plaskett had texted with the Epstein being discussed and defended her vote against censuring Plaskett or removing her committee assignments.
Community verdict
10 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 34
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: 25% good look
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Texas representative criticized for her accusation and subsequent defense
Political figure referenced through the McCain-Palin campaign
Political figure named in Crockett's list of alleged recipients
Delegate whose censure vote and 2019 texting with Jeffrey Epstein provide context
EPA administrator named in Crockett's list of alleged recipients
Political figure referenced through the McCain-Palin campaign
Part of a bigger story
20 OUTLETSCrockett named a Jeffrey Epstein as a donor to Lee Zeldin during a House speech; outlets on multiple sides report that the donor was a different person with the same name. She later said she had not meant the convicted sex offender. Left-leaning outlets focus on Crockett's mistaken identification and the criticism it drew. Center outlets likewise stress the error and Zeldin's rebuttal, with some articles also recounting her explanation or later reversal. Right-leaning outlets also stress the error, but more often present it as a political failure and her defense as inadequate.
- ARTICLES
- 34
- OUTLETS
- 20
- AVG CRED
- 53
- Yahoo News · Alan Dershowitz Compares 'Liar' Jasmine Crockett to Joseph McCarthy for Naming Wrong Epstein as GOP Donor
- New York Post · Jasmine Crockett is on a cringe streak, and I'm here for it
- redstate.com · Dr. Jeffrey Epstein Has Perfect Response to This Dem's Misleading Use of His Donation to Zeldin
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




