Massie, Khanna Announce Push To Impose Rare Congressional Punishment on Bondi for Withholding Epstein Files
Massie says he is working with Khanna on a resolution to fine Bondi over the delayed release of the Epstein files.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New York Sun is an established publication, but its opinion-oriented source classification warrants a lower score than a major general-news outlet. The article names its author and attributes key claims and counterarguments to public officials.
- Source type — Opinion-oriented publication classification lowers the institutional rating relative to general-news outlets.
- Transparency — It attributes key claims and quoted positions to named officials.
- Author attribution — The article identifies an author.
- Editorial standards — The article presents several sides, but the available text does not establish its corrections practice.
The report uses named officials’ statements and explains the proposed procedure and the Justice Department’s stated reason for delay. It offers some competing perspectives, though it relies largely on official comments and does not include a direct response from Bondi.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes arguments for contempt, the Justice Department’s explanation for the delay, and Kaine’s preference for other enforcement tools. Bondi herself is not quoted, leaving a modest gap in direct representation.
- Counterarguments presented — Blanche defends the department’s handling of redactions, and Kaine argues against moving to contempt or impeachment now.
- Source diversity — Several officials with different roles and positions are quoted, though all are public officials.
- Omitted context — Bondi is not directly quoted in the article.
- Loaded language — The framing is relatively restrained and attributes the legal criticism to the lawmakers.
The article largely reports attributed statements about the deadline, the proposed response and the department’s defense. Its framing does not show a clear political lean.
- Language tone — The account is mostly descriptive and attributes the central criticism to Massie and Khanna.
- Source selection — It includes the proposal’s supporters, a Justice Department defense and a lawmaker urging caution.
- Framing — The story centers on a proposed congressional response without adopting its advocates’ claims as settled fact.
Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna say they are drafting an inherent-contempt resolution that would fine Attorney General Pam Bondi for each day the Epstein files remain unreleased. Bondi’s deputy defended the department’s delay, while Senator Tim Kaine said he prefers other congressional tools.
After the deadline to release the Epstein files passed, Massie said he was drafting a resolution with Khanna to pursue inherent contempt against Bondi. Khanna said the proposal would impose daily fines, not authorize her detention. The lawmakers argued that the Justice Department’s release of some documents, with more to come, violated the disclosure law they had authored; the law allows exceptions and requires explanations for redactions.
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche defended the department’s actions, citing the need to protect victims’ identities. Kaine called contempt or impeachment efforts premature and said he would rather use appropriations measures and other tools to compel compliance.
Community verdict
12 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 35
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative drafting an inherent-contempt resolution with Ro Khanna
Representative drafting an inherent-contempt resolution with Thomas Massie
Khanna's version of this story ↗Attorney general facing a proposed inherent-contempt resolution over the delayed files
Bondi's version of this story ↗Deputy attorney general who defended the Justice Department’s handling of the files
President who signed the files disclosure law after opposing it
Secretary of Defense whose department faces a separate congressional disclosure requirement
Senator urging use of other congressional tools before contempt or impeachment
Part of a bigger story
29 OUTLETSThe Justice Department released only part of the Epstein files by the deadline, with many records redacted. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna criticized the release and said they were considering or preparing congressional action against Attorney General Pam Bondi. Left-leaning outlets emphasize the bipartisan accountability push, including possible impeachment. Center outlets focus on proposed contempt procedures and often include the department’s defense or alternative approaches from lawmakers. Right-leaning outlets also stress the push for fuller disclosure and possible action against Bondi, with some including the department’s defense.
- ARTICLES
- 35
- OUTLETS
- 29
- AVG CRED
- 62
- International Business Times · GOP Rep. Massie Says DOJ Broke The Law By Making 'Illegal Redaction' Of Epstein Files
- ZeroHedge · Stunner: DOJ Finds A Million More Epstein Documents - Will Take 'Weeks' To Review
- Cbc · Authorities were hot on the trail of Epstein's co-conspirators. Why weren't they named in the document dump?
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…








