Skip to main content
3 min read
● InformationalCourts / Judiciary

Donald Trump Floats Ted Cruz for Supreme Court Justice

Cruz said he would decline a Supreme Court nomination and wants to remain in the elected branches.

Donald Trump Floats Ted Cruz for Supreme Court Justice
Image · Newsweek

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityNewsweek75/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 11, 2026
Newsweek
Jan 28, 2026
tl;dr

Donald Trump publicly suggested Senator Ted Cruz as a possible future Supreme Court nominee. Cruz said he would not accept the position and wants to remain involved in political and policy debates.

Community verdict

VOTING CLOSED
How does this story look for
Ted Cruz R · TX · SEN
NOT RATEDCLOSED

No good or bad look here

This story reports what happened without casting Cruz in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Cruz’s record.

● INFORMATIONAL

People in this story

SWIPE →
Ted Cruz
R · TX · SEN

Senator Trump named as a possible future Supreme Court nominee

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who publicly floated Cruz as a possible Supreme Court nominee

Trump's version of this story ↗
ALSO MENTIONED  Clarence Thomas, Supreme Court justice mentioned in background on the Court's tenure and ages; George W. Bush, Former president mentioned in Cruz's career background; Samuel Alito, Supreme Court justice mentioned in background on the Court's tenure and ages; Sonia Sotomayor, Supreme Court justice mentioned in background on the Court's tenure and ages; William Rehnquist, Former chief justice mentioned in Cruz's career background

Part of a bigger story

6 OUTLETS
Trump Suggests Ted Cruz as Potential Supreme Court Nominee

The coverage reports that President Donald Trump floated Senator Ted Cruz as a possible Supreme Court nominee. Center outlets mostly report Cruz’s rejection and his wish to remain involved in politics, while some focus instead on Trump’s renewed suggestion, Cruz’s legal credentials or possible future vacancies.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…