Skip to main content
3 min read

Top House Republican accuses Minnesota AG Keith Ellison of lying about benefit fraud: 'Got something to hide'

Ellison has said he met the people in good faith and did not assist or benefit from their fraud.

Top House Republican accuses Minnesota AG Keith Ellison of lying about benefit fraud: 'Got something to hide'
Image · New York Post

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityNew York Post65/100 MEDIUM
This article1 analysis · Oct 9, 2026
tl;dr

House Majority Whip Tom Emmer accused Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison of misleading lawmakers about a 2021 meeting with people later convicted in the Feeding Our Future fraud case. Emmer said a House Oversight panel’s interim report supported his concerns, while Ellison’s team referred The Post to his earlier explanation.

Community verdict

VOTING CLOSED
How does this story look for
Keith Ellison Former U.S. Representative (D-MN)
NOT RATEDCLOSED

No good or bad look here

This story reports what happened without casting Ellison in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Ellison’s record.

● INFORMATIONAL

People in this story

SWIPE →
Keith Ellison
Former U.S. Representative (D-MN)

Minnesota attorney general whose account of a meeting Emmer challenged

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Tom Emmer
R · MN-6

House Majority Whip accusing Ellison of misleading lawmakers

Emmer's version of this story ↗
Timothy J. Walz
Former U.S. Representative (D-MN)

Minnesota governor named in Emmer’s broader allegations about state officials

Part of a bigger story

3 OUTLETS
House Oversight Committee Questions Keith Ellison on Minnesota Benefit Fraud

At a House Oversight hearing on Minnesota fraud, Gov. Tim Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison testified and defended their records. Center outlets present divided questioning over fraud allegations and Ellison’s defense; CBS also covers Democratic criticism of the federal immigration operation. Right-leaning outlets foreground Republican accusations about Ellison’s role and account of a meeting, while giving his response less prominence.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…