Don't lose heart Republicans -- Dem disasters like Graham Platner will only make things much, much worse
Devine acknowledges problems for Trump but argues that voters should compare him with the Democrats who might replace him.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New York Post is an established national outlet with an identifiable author and a distinct opinion section. Its institutional record is stronger than that of an anonymous or low-accountability site, though this column is commentary rather than original straight reporting.
- Source type — Established national publisher; the page is clearly labeled as opinion.
- Author attribution — The column identifies Miranda Devine as its author.
- Editorial standards — A recognizable newsroom and opinion operation, though the piece is not reported as a neutral news story.
This is a strongly argued opinion column that makes numerous serious characterizations and allegations while relying mostly on the author’s assertions and references to other coverage. It offers little competing perspective or independent evidence within the article.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The piece is an opinion column with a clear pro-Republican argument. Although it acknowledges some problems for Trump, it provides no meaningful response from the Democratic figures it criticizes.
- Opinion vs reporting — The article is an explicitly labeled opinion column advancing a political argument.
- Loaded language — Repeatedly uses condemnatory and mocking descriptions of Democratic candidates and figures.
- Counterarguments presented — Democratic candidates’ perspectives or responses are not included.
The column strongly favors Republicans and attacks Democratic figures with derisive language, while presenting Trump and Vance comparatively favorably despite acknowledging criticism of Trump.
- Language tone — Uses highly pejorative descriptions of Democratic figures, including “disasters” and “poseur.”
- Framing — Frames Democratic candidates as a reason Republicans should remain confident despite Trump’s problems.
- Source selection — Relies on negative descriptions and selected examples of Democrats without presenting their responses.
Miranda Devine argues that Republicans should not lose heart over President Trump’s problems because she considers the Democrats’ potential candidates, especially Graham Platner, worse alternatives. The opinion column criticizes several Democratic candidates and praises Vice President J.D. Vance by comparison.
Devine acknowledges Trump’s low poll numbers, the Iran war’s effect on gas prices, and his handling of the “lawfare” fund, and criticizes his recent scolding of reporter Jacqui Heinrich. She argues that voters should compare him with his political alternatives rather than expect perfection.
The column presents Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner as its leading example of what Devine calls a poor Democratic alternative, citing past scandals and his position in the primary race. It also criticizes other Democratic candidates and Hasan Piker, contrasts Platner with Vance, and faults Kamala Harris’s comments about “no bad ideas.” These are Devine’s characterizations and claims.
Community verdict
5 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President whose problems are compared with the Democratic alternatives
Vice president presented as a favorable contrast to Platner
Vance's version of this story ↗Democratic Senate candidate in Maine and the column’s leading example of a Democratic alternative
Platner's version of this story ↗Democratic Senate candidate in Texas
Republican representative whose engagement to reporter Jacqui Heinrich is mentioned
Former president paraphrased by Devine
Texas Democratic congressional candidate
Former vice president whose recent podcast remarks are criticized
Leading Democratic Senate candidate in Michigan
Maine governor and former Democratic Senate candidate who left the primary race
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…








