Abdul El-Sayed reveals he would take socialist plan a 'step further' than Bernie Sanders for key US industry
El-Sayed argued that AI needs public control and regulation, taking a position he said went beyond Bernie Sanders's proposal.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe New York Post is a national news outlet with a publisher rating of 66 across 120 stories, which supports a mid-range score. The page identifies an author and includes attributed reporting, though this article alone does not establish its corrections practices or broader reporting record.
- Source type — National news outlet; a stronger baseline than an aggregator or opinion-only source.
- Track record — The publisher's site rating is 66 based on 120 stories.
- Author attribution — The article names Ryan King as its author.
- Transparency — The story attributes key remarks to a podcast interview, but the page provides limited information about its reporting process.
The article uses direct quotations from a named candidate and gives some policy context, including Sanders’s proposal and the clarification that El-Sayed did not explicitly advocate taking ownership of private companies. It offers little competing policy perspective or independent analysis of the proposals.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents El-Sayed's remarks and relevant context about Sanders's proposal, while also clarifying that El-Sayed did not explicitly call for seizing private companies. It does not include a response from the AI industry or another substantive perspective on the policy.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantive counterargument to public control or the proposed AI policies is included.
- Source diversity — The main policy material comes from El-Sayed's interview and the article's description of Sanders's position.
- Omitted context — The article offers limited detail about the policy mechanisms or views of other stakeholders.
- Loaded language — The headline uses “socialist,” while the body is mostly attributed and factual.
The reporting is mostly factual, but the headline's use of “socialist” and the article's emphasis on public control and national-security concerns give the framing a modest right-leaning tilt. The article also includes El-Sayed's own explanation and clarifies what he did not explicitly propose.
- Headline — Labels the proposal a “socialist plan,” foregrounding an ideologically charged characterization.
- Framing — Highlights public control and Sanders’s cooperation-with-China remarks alongside national-security concerns.
- Language tone — Most of the body is straightforwardly attributed and relatively restrained.
Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed said he supports public ownership and control of artificial intelligence, going further than a plan proposed by Sen. Bernie Sanders. The article places the policy dispute in the context of a competitive Michigan Senate race.
During a June podcast interview, El-Sayed said he wanted to go further than Sanders’s proposed American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund, which the article describes as giving the government partial ownership of AI companies through a one-time equity tax on top technology firms. El-Sayed argued that AI needs public control and regulation because it poses risks to society. The article notes he did not explicitly call for the government to seize or take ownership of private AI companies.
Sanders has also advocated legislation to slow AI development and proposed a moratorium on data center construction. The article reports that El-Sayed later criticized Republican opponent Mike Rogers over data centers and says El-Sayed held a 0.7 percentage-point lead in the latest RealClearPolitics polling average.
Community verdict
9 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Michigan Senate candidate discussing public control of artificial intelligence
Senator whose AI proposals provide the comparison for El-Sayed's position
El-Sayed's Republican Senate opponent
Minnesota lieutenant governor whose campaign rally Sanders attended
Part of a bigger story
3 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed argued for public ownership and control of major AI companies. Center outlets assess whether the proposal amounts to communism, with PolitiFact concluding it does not and describing it as state capitalism or democratic socialism. Right-leaning outlets emphasize its socialist character and how it goes beyond Bernie Sanders’s proposal, placing it in a broader debate over socialism and control of industry.
- ARTICLES
- 3
- OUTLETS
- 3
- AVG CRED
- 73
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

