"Chaco is not for sale": NM lawmakers and Pueblo leaders fight to preserve protections
Leger Fernández argued that energy development can continue outside the protected buffer and criticized the lack of a meeting with Pueblo leaders.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates New Mexico Political Report, where this article appeared. The other scores rate the article itself.
New Mexico Political Report is a local news publisher, and the article names its reporter and identifies The Paper as the byline outlet. The attribution supports transparency, though the page gives limited detail about the publisher’s corrections practices.
- Source type — Local news publisher with a regional reporting focus.
- Author attribution — Reporter and The Paper are identified in the byline.
- Transparency — The reporting attribution is clear, but corrections and editorial policies are not described in the article.
The article includes named statements from lawmakers, Pueblo leadership and the Bureau of Land Management, and outlines the proposal’s alternatives. The agency perspective is present but limited, and the article does not provide detailed evidence or responses from supporters of revoking the protections.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article primarily presents arguments for retaining the protections, with the agency’s brief statement and the alternatives in its assessment offering some other context. It does not include a substantive argument from proponents of revocation.
- Source diversity — Lawmakers, Pueblo leaders and a BLM director are represented, but most comments favor keeping protections.
- Counterarguments presented — The agency’s process and alternatives are noted, but no detailed case for revocation is presented.
- Loaded language — Strong phrases appear in attributed quotations rather than as the reporter’s narration.
The article reports the effort to preserve the protections in mostly neutral language and attributes arguments to their speakers. Its quoted comments favor retaining the protections, but it also includes the agency’s description of its review.
- Language tone — Mostly descriptive, with quoted advocacy attributed to its speakers.
- Source selection — Includes lawmakers and Pueblo leaders pressing for protections as well as a BLM director’s statement.
- Framing — Centers the delegation’s effort but presents the agency review and its alternatives.
Original publisher not identified
This article credits another publisher, which ChamberLight has not identified, so the scores are New Mexico Political Report's own.
New Mexico lawmakers and Pueblo leaders urged Interior Secretary Doug Burgum to keep protections around the Greater Chaco landscape and extend the public comment period. They warn that revoking the protections could put cultural sites at risk.
Pueblo governors and New Mexico’s congressional delegation called on Burgum to withdraw a proposal to revoke Public Land Order 7923, which set aside about 336,000 acres around Chaco Culture National Historical Park from new oil and gas leasing for 20 years. They also sought a longer public comment period and government-to-government consultation with tribes.
Martin Heinrich and Teresa Leger Fernández argued that energy production can continue while preserving culturally significant sites. Pueblo council chairman Joey Sanchez described Chaco as a living cultural landscape, while Bureau of Land Management Director Stevan Pearce said the agency welcomed public input as it assessed the effects of revoking the withdrawal. The proposal includes alternatives ranging from keeping the protections to allowing leasing beyond a five-mile buffer.
Community verdict
22 VOTES
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative urging the administration to preserve the Chaco protections
Senator urging the administration to preserve the Chaco protections
Heinrich's version of this story ↗
Bureau of Land Management director commenting on the agency's review
Senator who joined the delegation urging preservation of the protections
Representative who joined the delegation urging preservation of the protections
Interior Secretary asked to withdraw the proposal and criticized for not meeting Pueblo leaders
Representative urging that the protections not be undone without further review
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…