Skip to main content
2 min read
◆ Mixed look for TrumpEconomy

President Trump backs Durbin's bill to lower credit card swipe fees

Trump endorsed the bill and urged people to support it, while also proposing a temporary cap on credit card interest rates.

President Trump backs Durbin's bill to lower credit card swipe fees
Image · Nbcchicago

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityNbcchicago77/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 11, 2026
Jan 13, 2026
tl;dr

President Donald Trump endorsed a bipartisan bill from Sens. Dick Durbin and Roger Marshall that would require large banks to support multiple card networks, a change intended to lower swipe fees. Banking and credit union groups warn it could reduce security and credit card rewards.

Community verdict

27 VOTES
How does this story look for
Donald Trump R · President of the United States

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 3

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 12 · ◆ 5 · ▼ 10

People in this story

SWIPE →
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who endorsed the Credit Card Competition Act

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Roger Marshall
R · KS · SEN

Senator and co-sponsor of the Credit Card Competition Act

Marshall's version of this story ↗
Richard J. Durbin
D · IL · SEN

Senator and co-sponsor of the Credit Card Competition Act

Durbin's version of this story ↗
ALSO MENTIONED  JB Pritzker, Governor of Illinois who signed the state’s Interchange Fee Prohibition Act

Part of a bigger story

3 OUTLETS
Mike Johnson Comments on Trump's Proposed Credit Card Interest Rate Cap

Outlets agree Trump proposed a temporary 10% cap on credit-card interest and that House Speaker Mike Johnson questioned it, warning it could limit access to credit. Center outlets cover possible effects of credit-card policy, with one focusing on Johnson’s concerns about the cap and another on Trump’s endorsement of a separate swipe-fee bill and reactions to it. Right-leaning outlets stress risks to credit access and skepticism about the cap’s congressional prospects.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…