As Trump sides again with Putin, even Republicans are joining the backlash
Tillis joined lawmakers urging Trump to reverse the sanctions decision and said the move may violate the law.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYMS NOW is an established national news organization, and this article identifies its author and attributes reporting to NBC News and Politico. Its blog format and the piece’s strongly opinionated presentation warrant some caution, but do not erase the publisher’s institutional standards.
- Source type — Established national news publisher.
- Editorial standards — The publisher has an established newsroom, though this is a commentary-style blog post.
- Author attribution — The article names Steve Benen as its author.
- Transparency — The article attributes outside reporting and quotations to named sources and outlets.
The article cites named news outlets and quotes Tillis and Paul Krugman, and it gives a clear account of the reported policy and the 2022 law. Its treatment is largely critical of Trump, offers little explanation of the administration’s rationale, and does not name the 2022 law or provide supporting legal analysis.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article reports bipartisan objections and notes the White House’s response, but gives little substance to the administration’s explanation or any defense of the deal. Its own narration repeatedly adopts a critical view of Trump’s actions.
- Counterarguments presented — The White House response is mentioned but not explained or developed.
- Loaded language — The author uses strongly condemnatory descriptions of Trump and the deal.
- Source diversity — Includes criticism from Democrats and Republicans but little substantive defense of the policy.
- Opinion vs reporting — Commentary and the author’s judgments are interwoven with reported details.
The article is strongly critical of Trump’s actions and uses charged language to characterize them. It gives little space to any defense of the policy or the administration’s rationale.
- Language tone — Uses phrases such as “kowtow to Russia” and “betraying his own country’s foreign policy.”
- Framing — Frames the deal as favoring Putin and damaging U.S. interests.
- Source selection — Features critics of the policy, including Democratic leaders, Republican lawmakers and Paul Krugman.
Trump announced a deal to import Russian diesel and the Treasury Department said it would lift sanctions on Russian exports, prompting bipartisan criticism. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis said Trump may be violating the law, while other Republicans called for the decision to be reversed or blocked.
The article reports that Trump announced an agreement to import Russian diesel and that the Treasury Department said it had decided to lift sanctions on Russian diesel exports. It also describes Trump’s praise of Putin and criticism of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The author argues that the agreement conflicts with a law Congress passed in 2022 banning Russian oil imports and that the law remains in effect.
Four Republican senators, including Tillis, joined Democrats in urging Trump to reverse course. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick announced plans for a discharge petition to force a vote against the policy. Tillis told NBC News that Trump’s decision may be breaking the law; the White House referred Politico to Trump’s post about an “energy ceasefire” between Russia and Ukraine.
Community verdict
13 VOTES- Readers of left-leaning coverage: 60% good look
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator who joined lawmakers urging Trump to reverse the decision and questioned whether it was lawful
President who announced the Russian diesel agreement and defended it
Trump's version of this story ↗Senator who joined lawmakers calling for Trump to reverse the decision
Representative who announced plans for a discharge petition to force a vote against the policy
Former president who signed the 2022 Russian oil-import ban into law
Senator who joined lawmakers calling for Trump to reverse the decision
Senator who joined lawmakers calling for Trump to reverse the decision
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






