Missouri's Eric Burlison breaks ranks, votes 'no' on funding bill that ended government shutdown
Burlison opposed the funding package, saying its earmarks were a reason he could not support it.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYMissourinet is a local news outlet with an identified author and attributed statements from named officials. The short report provides direct quotes and voting information but little independent documentation or broader context.
- Source type — Local news outlet covering state and regional public affairs.
- Author attribution — The article names Marshall Griffin as its author.
- Editorial standards — The report attributes key explanations to named lawmakers and identifies the source of their statements.
- Transparency — The story gives a voting rundown but does not cite underlying records or provide additional sourcing.
The report identifies the vote and presents explanations from lawmakers on both sides, including direct quotations. It gives little detail about the bill’s provisions, does not include an independent account of the earmarks or immigration-funding claims, and supplies no vote tally.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The report includes views from lawmakers who opposed the bill for different reasons and a Republican who supported it. It offers limited detail on the bill itself and does not include an independent response to the claims about earmarks or immigration funding.
- Counterarguments presented — Opponents’ explanations and a supporter’s statement are included.
- Source diversity — The story quotes lawmakers from both parties, but does not include outside experts or documents.
- Omitted context — It gives little explanation of the package’s provisions or the claims about specific spending.
- Loaded language — Charged phrases such as “swampy” and “lawlessness” appear in attributed quotations.
The report uses mostly straightforward language and attributes lawmakers’ competing explanations to them. Its focus on Burlison’s break with most of his party reflects the headline and story structure, not an evident ideological slant.
- Language tone — The article mainly uses neutral descriptions and quoted statements.
- Source selection — It includes explanations from lawmakers who opposed and supported the bill.
- Framing — The headline emphasizes Burlison’s departure from the usual party alignment, consistent with the story’s focus.
Missouri Rep. Eric Burlison voted against H.R. 7148, the funding bill that ended the latest government shutdown, citing earmarks. Missouri Democrats Wesley Bell and Emanuel Cleaver also voted no, while most of the state’s delegation supported the bill.
Burlison said he opposed the funding package because it included what he called “really bad earmarks,” including spending he said was sought by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. Bell and Cleaver also voted against the bill, citing concerns about funding for immigration enforcement. Rep. Mark Alford supported it and highlighted funding for his district.
President Trump signed the bill late Tuesday. The article’s rundown shows that most members of Missouri’s congressional delegation voted yes, while Burlison, Bell and Cleaver voted no.
Community verdict
49 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Missouri representative who voted against the bill and opposed ICE funding
President who signed the spending bill
Missouri representative who voted yes on the bill
Missouri representative who voted yes on the bill
Missouri representative who voted yes on the bill
Missouri senator who voted yes on the bill
Senate minority leader whom Burlison said had demanded earmarks
Missouri senator who voted yes on the bill
Missouri representative who supported the stopgap bill
Missouri representative who voted against the bill over Department of Homeland Security funding
Missouri representative who voted yes on the bill
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…











