Lawmakers learned through press that Trump wanted to indict them
The article reports that Trump’s administration tried to indict the lawmakers after he denounced their video.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Minnlawyer, which republished this story. The other scores rate the article itself.
Reuters is a major wire service with established reporting and editorial standards. The article is credited to Reuters, although it appears on Minnesota Lawyer.
- Source type — Reuters is a major international wire service with a strong record of original reporting.
- Editorial standards — The reporting attributes key claims to named participants, a document and a source familiar with the matter.
- Author attribution — The article is explicitly credited to Reuters.
- Transparency — The key grand-jury account relies in part on an unnamed source, limiting independent verification in the article.
The article attributes the account of the grand-jury decision to a source familiar with the matter and includes lawmakers’ statements, a lawyer’s letter and the White House’s response. It gives little direct detail from the Justice Department or about the basis for the attempted indictment.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article includes the White House’s national-security claim and Thune’s criticism of the video, but most detail comes from the lawmakers and their representatives. It does not include a direct Justice Department account of the attempted indictment.
- Counterarguments presented — The White House called the video a national-security threat, and Thune criticized the lawmakers’ decision to release it.
- Source diversity — The article draws on lawmakers, their lawyer, an unnamed source, the White House and a Republican leader.
- Omitted context — No direct Justice Department explanation of the charges sought or the grand-jury process appears.
- Loaded language — The strongest language is attributed to sources, including Kelly and Trump.
The report uses mostly straightforward language and attributes critical claims to the people making them. It includes the White House’s national-security characterization of the video and John Thune’s criticism of it, alongside the lawmakers’ responses.
- Language tone — The article generally describes events in neutral, attributed terms.
- Source selection — It includes lawmakers’ accounts, an unnamed source, the White House’s position and a Republican leader’s response.
- Framing — The article centers on the attempted indictment and the lawmakers’ response without overt editorial judgment.
Republished with credit
Republished from Reuters, with credit to the original publisher.
100 stories · 94.8–95.3 · updated Oct 11, 2026
This is Reuters's own score, and this article is credited to Reuters. The host score in the Source Check is Minnlawyer's.
A grand jury rejected the Trump administration’s attempt to indict six Democratic lawmakers after they urged military personnel to refuse unlawful orders. Mark Kelly, Jason Crow and Elissa Slotkin said they were considering legal action or seeking records about the investigation.
The lawmakers learned of the indictment attempt through press reports and did not know what charges prosecutors had sought. A source familiar with the matter said a grand jury rejected the attempt. The lawmakers had released a video urging military personnel to refuse unlawful orders, which Trump accused them of sedition over; the White House later said he did not want them executed.
Kelly criticized Trump and his allies at a news conference, while Slotkin said she was leaving open the possibility of a lawsuit and described the inquiry. Crow’s lawyer asked U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro to stop pursuing the probe and preserve documents, citing possible violations of Crow’s free-speech rights and protections for members of Congress.
Community verdict
42 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →President whose administration sought the indictments
Senator describing the probe and considering a response
Slotkin's version of this story ↗Defense secretary named in Kelly’s separate lawsuit
Senate majority leader who criticized the video but opposed indicting the lawmakers
Federal Reserve chair cited as a comparison
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






