Letters to the Editor: Senator’s botched gotcha moment in Jack Smith hearing is just sad
Letter writers criticize Schmitt’s failed attempt to challenge Jack Smith during a Senate hearing.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYThe Los Angeles Times is an established national newspaper with editorial standards and a corrections process. This page presents reader-submitted letters rather than original reported journalism, so its institutional reputation does not establish the letters’ claims.
- Track record — Established national newspaper with a substantial record of reporting.
- Editorial standards — The publisher has professional editorial standards; the page is a letters section, not a reported news article.
- Transparency — The letters identify their writers by name and city.
- Source type — National news publisher; the opinions on this page are reader submissions.
The letters clearly identify their opinions and refer to a specific hearing episode, but offer little independent evidence or context and present no opposing perspective.
HOW WE SCORE ↗Both letters advance a similar critical view of Republicans and favorable view of Smith and Klobuchar. The page includes no response from the criticized figures or alternative perspective.
- Counterarguments presented — No counterargument or response from the criticized figures appears.
- Loaded language — The letters use overtly evaluative language about Schmitt, Trump, and Cabinet members.
- Opinion vs reporting — This is a letters page presenting opinion, not a report that claims to offer balanced coverage.
- Source diversity — Two writers are included, but their views align on the main figures.
Both letters sharply criticize Republican figures and praise Klobuchar and Smith, with no countervailing perspective. The strongly critical framing gives the page a left-leaning presentation.
- Language tone — Uses dismissive descriptions of Republican officials and strongly approving descriptions of Smith and Klobuchar.
- Source selection — Both selected letters express criticism of Republicans and support for Smith and Klobuchar.
- Framing — Frames Schmitt’s hearing moment as an embarrassing failure and Republicans’ treatment of Smith as unjustified.
Two letters criticize Sen. Eric Schmitt’s failed gotcha attempt against Jack Smith and praise Sen. Amy Klobuchar for correcting him. The writers also defend Smith’s work as a prosecutor and criticize the Trump administration’s Cabinet.
One letter writer called Schmitt’s attempt to challenge Smith in a Senate hearing a failed gotcha, and criticized the Cabinet secretaries’ loyalty to President Trump. The writer also said Republicans had assailed Smith for trying to bring the president to justice over the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.
A second writer praised Klobuchar for correcting Schmitt and objected to a critic’s description of her intervention as “womansplain[ing].” The writer described Smith and Klobuchar as “equanimous.”
Community verdict
15 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 10
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator criticized for his attempt to catch Jack Smith in an error during a hearing
Senator praised by a letter writer for correcting Schmitt during the hearing
Klobuchar's version of this story ↗President criticized by a letter writer in a comparison with Schmitt and Cabinet members
Defense secretary criticized by a letter writer
Health and Human Services secretary criticized by a letter writer
Part of a bigger story
8 OUTLETSLeft-leaning and center outlets report that Schmitt questioned former special counsel Jack Smith at a Senate hearing about an Atlanta Hawks game Smith had not attended; Smith had attended a different game. Left-leaning outlets portray the questioning as an unsupported attempt to corner Smith and emphasize Schmitt’s later withdrawal from a planned C-SPAN appearance. Center outlets also criticize the exchange as a botched challenge, while some coverage focuses on reactions to the mistake and the broader effort to pursue Smith.
- ARTICLES
- 10
- OUTLETS
- 8
- AVG CRED
- 65
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…




