Trump Is Just Going to Recreate the "Weaponization" Slush Fund, You Idiots
Cornyn’s spokeswoman said he had secured guarantees about the fund, claims the column disputes.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYJezebel is an established publication, but this article is an unsigned, strongly opinionated piece rather than a transparently sourced report. Its claims are tied to attributed statements, though the article offers limited independent documentation.
- Source type — An established digital publication, but this piece is commentary rather than straight reporting.
- Editorial standards — The outlet has an established editorial identity, but the article's polemical presentation makes its reporting standards less evident here.
- Author attribution — No author is identified in the supplied article information.
- Transparency — The article attributes several statements but provides little visible documentation for its broader assertions.
The article refers to statements by Blanche, Cornyn’s spokeswoman, Tillis and Trump, and includes direct quotations. However, it relies heavily on the writer’s interpretation, uses highly charged language, and provides little independent documentation or opposing context.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is a one-sided polemic. It includes some statements from the people discussed, but mainly to reject or mock their position, without substantive counterarguments or independent verification.
- Counterarguments presented — The article presents no sustained defense of the senators’ or administration’s position.
- Loaded language — Frequent insults and emphatic judgments dominate the presentation.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an argumentative column rather than neutral event reporting.
- Source diversity — It quotes or describes statements by several participants but adds little independent or opposing evidence.
The article uses strongly derogatory language about Trump, his administration and Republican senators, and presents no sympathetic or countervailing interpretation. Its framing is strongly left-leaning.
- Language tone — Uses insults and dismissive descriptions of Trump, his administration and the senators.
- Framing — Frames the senators’ actions as false resistance and the administration as likely to evade constraints.
- Source selection — Reports statements from the relevant figures but offers no supportive perspective or independent response to the writer’s claims.
The column argues that Todd Blanche’s statements about ending the Justice Department’s “weaponization” fund do not prevent its recreation, and criticizes Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis for treating them as assurances. It also reports that Donald Trump threatened to revive the fund if Blanche was not confirmed.
The column says Cornyn and Tillis had withheld votes to advance Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination while seeking assurances that the Justice Department’s $1.8 billion “weaponization” fund would not return. It argues that Blanche’s statements and order do not rule out creating a similar fund later. Cornyn’s spokeswoman said Cornyn had secured a formal order permanently terminating the fund and a binding document limiting an IRS settlement with Trump; the column calls those claims fabrications. It says Tillis had criticized the fund but had not yet responded to Blanche’s statements.
The article also reports that Trump threatened to revive the fund if the Senate did not confirm Blanche, and said he could leave Blanche in an acting role and submit his nomination again later. The writer argues that confirmation would not prevent the administration from making similar payouts or recreating the fund.
Community verdict
5 VOTES
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator whose office said he had secured assurances about the fund while considering Blanche’s nomination
Senator who had withheld his vote and criticized the fund
Tillis's version of this story ↗
President who threatened to revive the fund if Blanche was not confirmed
Trump's version of this story ↗
Acting attorney general whose nomination and statements about the fund are discussed
Blanche's version of this story ↗Part of a bigger story
15 OUTLETSCornyn and Thom Tillis opposed advancing Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination over a Justice Department fund and tax-audit protections. After the department rescinded the fund and narrowed the protections, both said they would support advancing Blanche’s nomination. Left-leaning outlets connect Cornyn’s opposition to efforts to end the fund, while one column questions whether the assurances can prevent its return. Center outlets mostly present the agreement as clearing Blanche’s path, though CNN questions whether it closes loopholes. Right-leaning outlets portray the agreement as a negotiated concession that lets Blanche’s nomination advance.
- ARTICLES
- 17
- OUTLETS
- 15
- AVG CRED
- 72
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…