Trump Is Just Going to Recreate the "Weaponization" Slush Fund, You Idiots
Trump threatened to revive the fund if the Senate did not confirm Blanche.
SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYJezebel is an established publication, but this article is an unsigned, strongly opinionated piece rather than a transparently sourced report. Its claims are tied to attributed statements, though the article offers limited independent documentation.
- Source type — An established digital publication, but this piece is commentary rather than straight reporting.
- Editorial standards — The outlet has an established editorial identity, but the article's polemical presentation makes its reporting standards less evident here.
- Author attribution — No author is identified in the supplied article information.
- Transparency — The article attributes several statements but provides little visible documentation for its broader assertions.
The article refers to statements by Blanche, Cornyn’s spokeswoman, Tillis and Trump, and includes direct quotations. However, it relies heavily on the writer’s interpretation, uses highly charged language, and provides little independent documentation or opposing context.
HOW WE SCORE ↗This is a one-sided polemic. It includes some statements from the people discussed, but mainly to reject or mock their position, without substantive counterarguments or independent verification.
- Counterarguments presented — The article presents no sustained defense of the senators’ or administration’s position.
- Loaded language — Frequent insults and emphatic judgments dominate the presentation.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an argumentative column rather than neutral event reporting.
- Source diversity — It quotes or describes statements by several participants but adds little independent or opposing evidence.
The article uses strongly derogatory language about Trump, his administration and Republican senators, and presents no sympathetic or countervailing interpretation. Its framing is strongly left-leaning.
- Language tone — Uses insults and dismissive descriptions of Trump, his administration and the senators.
- Framing — Frames the senators’ actions as false resistance and the administration as likely to evade constraints.
- Source selection — Reports statements from the relevant figures but offers no supportive perspective or independent response to the writer’s claims.
The column argues that Todd Blanche’s statements about ending the Justice Department’s “weaponization” fund do not prevent its recreation, and criticizes Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis for treating them as assurances. It also reports that Donald Trump threatened to revive the fund if Blanche was not confirmed.
The column says Cornyn and Tillis had withheld votes to advance Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination while seeking assurances that the Justice Department’s $1.8 billion “weaponization” fund would not return. It argues that Blanche’s statements and order do not rule out creating a similar fund later. Cornyn’s spokeswoman said Cornyn had secured a formal order permanently terminating the fund and a binding document limiting an IRS settlement with Trump; the column calls those claims fabrications. It says Tillis had criticized the fund but had not yet responded to Blanche’s statements.
The article also reports that Trump threatened to revive the fund if the Senate did not confirm Blanche, and said he could leave Blanche in an acting role and submit his nomination again later. The writer argues that confirmation would not prevent the administration from making similar payouts or recreating the fund.
Community verdict
6 VOTES
People in this story
SWIPE →President who threatened to revive the fund if Blanche was not confirmed
Senator who had withheld his vote and criticized the fund
Tillis's version of this story ↗
Senator whose office said he had secured assurances about the fund while considering Blanche’s nomination
Cornyn's version of this story ↗
Acting attorney general whose nomination and statements about the fund are discussed
Blanche's version of this story ↗Part of a bigger story
7 OUTLETSOutlets agree that the proposed Justice Department fund became a point of contention in Todd Blanche’s attorney general nomination: Cornyn and Tillis held up his nomination while seeking assurances, and Trump weighed in. Left-leaning outlets emphasize the fund’s disputed origins and Trump’s threat to revive it, with some coverage questioning whether Blanche’s assurances would last. Center outlets focus on Blanche’s rescission of the fund order and the resulting path toward a committee vote on his nomination. Right-leaning outlets present the rescission as a tactical concession in a deal advancing Blanche’s nomination.
- ARTICLES
- 7
- OUTLETS
- 7
- AVG CRED
- 61
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…