Leaked Photos of Pam Bondi's Binder Show Epstein-Related Search History of Congress Members
Jayapal said the document’s presence at the hearing was inappropriate and was organizing a letter about alleged monitoring of lawmakers’ searches.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYInternational Business Times UK is an established digital news publisher, but this article relies substantially on statements from lawmakers and provides limited independent verification of the central surveillance allegation. The author is identified, and the article notes that the DOJ had not responded.
- Source type — An established international digital news outlet, though not a major newspaper of record or wire service.
- Editorial standards — The story includes a cautious response from the House Speaker and notes the DOJ had not responded, but offers limited independent verification.
- Author attribution — The article names an author and attributes key claims to identifiable lawmakers and the DOJ.
The article reports what the photographs appeared to show and attributes allegations and responses to named lawmakers. It notes the DOJ had not responded, but does not independently establish who compiled the search history or why it was in Bondi’s binder, leaving the central allegation unresolved.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents the lawmakers’ concerns alongside Johnson’s caution and notes the DOJ’s stated position on its broader release of records. However, the DOJ does not respond to the specific monitoring allegation, and the account gives more space to critics.
- Source diversity — Includes statements from lawmakers of both parties, but no direct DOJ response to the central allegation.
- Counterarguments presented — Johnson calls the allegations unsubstantiated; the DOJ’s broader claim that it met its legal obligation is also included.
- Omitted context — The article does not establish who created the document or explain its purpose, limiting assessment of the competing claims.
The article uses mostly descriptive language and attributes allegations to lawmakers rather than presenting them as established facts. It includes both criticism of the alleged monitoring and Johnson’s caution that the claims are unsubstantiated.
- Language tone — Mostly neutral reporting language, with charged terms such as “surveillance” attributed to lawmakers.
- Source selection — Quotes Democratic and Republican lawmakers and includes Johnson’s skeptical response; the DOJ had not responded.
- Framing — Frames the issue as an unresolved oversight dispute rather than declaring the allegation proven.
Photos from a House hearing showed Attorney General Pam Bondi with a document labeled as Pramila Jayapal’s search history in unredacted Epstein files, prompting allegations that the Justice Department monitored lawmakers. Jayapal and Jamie Raskin called for scrutiny, while Speaker Mike Johnson said the claims were unsubstantiated.
Photos taken at a House Judiciary Committee hearing showed Bondi holding a document titled “Jayapal Pramila Search History,” which appeared to list files Jayapal accessed while reviewing unredacted Epstein-related records. Raskin said the DOJ’s monitored search system could amount to surveillance and called for an inspector general inquiry; Jayapal called the document’s presence at the hearing inappropriate and said she was organizing a letter about alleged surveillance. Nancy Mace also called the alleged monitoring “creepy.”
The DOJ has not formally responded to the monitoring allegations. Johnson said the claims were “unsubstantiated,” while also saying it would be inappropriate if the DOJ had used Jayapal’s search history against her. The article says the DOJ released more than 3 million pages under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, but lawmakers criticized the release as incomplete and the DOJ said it had fulfilled its legal obligation.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Jayapal in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Jayapal’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative whose search history appeared in a document shown at the hearing
Representative who criticized the alleged tracking of congressional searches
Speaker of the House who called the allegations unsubstantiated
House Judiciary Committee Democrat who called for an inspector general inquiry
Part of a bigger story
9 OUTLETSA document or photo in Attorney General Pam Bondi’s hearing materials appeared to show Rep. Pramila Jayapal’s searches of unredacted Epstein files. Jayapal objected to the apparent tracking and called for action or an accounting. Left-leaning outlets frame the episode as a threat to congressional oversight. Center outlets emphasize Jayapal’s calls for an accounting, investigation or end to tracking, alongside the Justice Department’s explanation. Right-leaning outlets likewise report lawmakers’ concerns but pair them with the department’s explanation that it logs searches to protect victims’ information.
- ARTICLES
- 13
- OUTLETS
- 9
- AVG CRED
- 67
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…






