Skip to main content
▼ Bad look for HigginsForeign PolicyDefense / Military

'Wipe. Them. Out.' Rep. Clay Higgins cheers on Trump's threats of Iran's destruction

Clay Higgins called for intensified attacks on Iran and said he would support a ceasefire only after the regime and its weapons were destroyed.

'Wipe. Them. Out.' Rep. Clay Higgins cheers on Trump's threats of Iran's destruction
Image · https://www.fox8live.com

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Host credibilityhttps://www.fox8live.com74/100 HIGH
This article1 analysis · Oct 12, 2026

Credibility rates https://www.fox8live.com, which carries this article. The other scores rate the article itself. https://www.fox8live.com's published outlet score.

Republished

Republished from Kplctv. ChamberLight matched this page's text to Kplctv's article.

Not enough stories yet: 0 of 10.

Republished by Wafb

tl;dr

Rep. Clay Higgins urged President Donald Trump to intensify attacks on Iran, posting that he would support a ceasefire only after the Iranian regime was dead and its homes reduced to rubble. Trump had threatened massive destruction if Iran did not meet his demands, drawing objections from Iran’s U.N. representative and Pope Leo XIV.

Community verdict

22 VOTES
How does this story look for
Clay Higgins R · LA-3

Counts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 5

● OPEN
Votes cast on this page

Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0

People in this story

SWIPE →
Clay Higgins
R · LA-3

Louisiana representative who urged Trump to intensify attacks on Iran

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who threatened destruction in Iran if his demands were not met

Trump's version of this story ↗

Part of a bigger story

3 OUTLETS
Clay Higgins Posts Conditions for a Ceasefire With Iran

Clay Higgins publicly backed intensified U.S. attacks on Iran, endorsing calls for an escalation of the bombing campaign. Center outlets portray Higgins as backing escalation; one ties his conditional ceasefire position to Trump's deadline, while another notes criticism of threats to civilian infrastructure.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…