Nazi-Tatted Creep Has Surprising Take on Law Enforcement: 'Opportunistic Cowards'
The article argues that Platner’s previously reported comments about police could hurt his Senate campaign.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYHotAir is a partisan blog, and this piece is strongly opinionated rather than a restrained report. It attributes some material to other outlets but provides limited original sourcing or independent verification in the article.
- Source type — A blog with a clear partisan orientation; the article uses polemical framing.
- Editorial standards — The piece reads primarily as commentary and does not show a substantial process of independent verification.
- Author attribution — A named author is credited.
- Transparency — It identifies earlier reporting by other outlets but offers limited detail about its own reporting process.
The piece identifies prior reporting and quotes the posts at issue, but offers little original evidence or response from Platner and relies heavily on insults, broad assertions, and speculation about future disclosures.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The article presents a strongly critical interpretation of Platner’s past comments, with no response from him or meaningful counterargument. Its charged language and speculative claims further limit balance.
- Counterarguments presented — No substantive defense or response from Platner is included.
- Loaded language — The author repeatedly uses personal insults and partisan characterizations.
- Source diversity — Earlier reports are referenced, but the article does not offer a range of perspectives on the posts.
- Omitted context — The article provides little context from Platner or other sources about the remarks.
The article uses strongly derisive language about Platner and progressive politics and explicitly argues that his candidacy is a problem for Democrats. Its framing is markedly favorable to Collins and unfavorable to Platner.
- Language tone — Repeated insults and pejorative labels portray Platner and the political left with contempt.
- Framing — Past comments are framed as evidence of a dangerous political character and a campaign liability.
- Headline — The headline uses an insulting label and highlights a provocative quotation.
HotAir revisits Graham Platner’s previously reported online comments criticizing police, framing them as a political liability in his Maine Senate campaign. The article argues that further revelations could threaten his candidacy.
The article recounts posts Platner made in 2020 criticizing law enforcement, including calling police “opportunistic cowards” and writing “all cops are bastards.” It says Fox News picked up the comments from earlier reporting and describes other past remarks about policing. The author portrays Platner’s views as radical and argues they could hurt him with general-election voters.
The author also says Platner’s campaign has refused to provide its Kik archives and speculates that more material could emerge. The piece mentions Janet Mills as an earlier rival and presents Susan Collins as an alternative for Maine voters.
Community verdict
VOTING CLOSEDNo good or bad look here
This story reports what happened without casting Platner in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Platner’s record.
People in this story
SWIPE →Maine Senate candidate whose past online comments about law enforcement are revisited
Maine senator presented as an alternative for voters
Senator used as a comparison in the article’s description of the electorate
Maine Senate candidate mentioned as an earlier rival
Part of a bigger story
4 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 4
- OUTLETS
- 4
- AVG CRED
- 59
- The Maine Wire · Editorial: Graham Platner Wants to Write the Laws. Apparently He Has Contempt for Those Who Enforce Them.
- Wgme · Maine Service Employees Association endorses Democrat Graham Platner for U.S. Senate
- Yahoo News · Dem Senate hopeful under fire for resurfaced comments calling cops 'opportunistic cowards'
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



