Republicans cautious on energy prices despite ceasefire
Rep. Andy Biggs used the conflict to argue that the United States should prioritize energy independence and dominance.
3 min read
Search people, articles, bills, and more
Rep. Andy Biggs used the conflict to argue that the United States should prioritize energy independence and dominance.
Republished from Politico, with credit to the original publisher.
99 stories · 84–85 · updated Sep 25, 2026
This is Politico's own score, and this article is credited to Politico. The host score in the Source Check is DNYUZ's.
After President Donald Trump announced a two-week ceasefire with Iran, Republican lawmakers voiced support or caution but mostly avoided discussing oil prices and energy-market risks. Democrats argued that the conflict had raised costs for consumers and left oil supplies vulnerable.
Senate Minority Leader who criticized the war’s effects on consumers
Schumer's version of this story ↗
House Energy and Commerce Committee chair who commented on the ceasefire
Guthrie's version of this story ↗
Senator who called for continued pressure on Iran
Hoeven's version of this story ↗
Senator who cautiously welcomed the ceasefire
Cramer's version of this story ↗
Energy and Natural Resources Committee chair who praised the ceasefire
Lee's version of this story ↗President whose ceasefire announcement and Iran policy frame the article
Trump's version of this story ↗
House Energy and Commerce ranking member who discussed oil-supply disruption
Pallone's version of this story ↗
Representative who criticized Iran’s influence over Strait of Hormuz traffic
Levin's version of this story ↗Loading comments…
House Energy and Commerce ranking member who discussed oil-supply disruption
Pallone's version of this story ↗Representative who criticized Iran’s influence over Strait of Hormuz traffic
Levin's version of this story ↗
