These four House Democrats voted for 18-month extension of FISA without any reforms
The article names him as one of four Democrats who voted with Republicans on the procedural measure for an 18-month FISA extension.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYDaily Kos is an established political blog, but this post offers limited sourcing and uses a strongly framed account without presenting opposing arguments. The named author provides some accountability, though the article does not show the reporting or verification behind its claims.
- Source type — A political blog; lower baseline than a newsroom with formal reporting standards.
- Editorial standards — The post is one-sided and does not demonstrate rigorous sourcing or verification.
- Author attribution — The post names an author, but provides little information about the reporting process.
- Transparency — It points readers to other outlets for details but does not link or identify specific supporting reporting in the article text.
The article gives specific names, measures and vote outcomes, but provides little evidence beyond its own assertions, offers no countervailing explanation of the surveillance authorities, and does not clearly distinguish the procedural vote from support for the underlying program.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The account reports the vote and identifies lawmakers, but gives only a critical framing of the extension and includes no explanation of the case for renewing the surveillance authority or response from the members.
- Counterarguments presented — No arguments in favor of the extension are included.
- Source diversity — The article does not quote lawmakers, officials, or outside experts.
- Loaded language — Terms such as “warrantless surveillance” and “Trump’s war against Iran” set a critical tone.
- Omitted context — It provides little detail about the program or the arguments surrounding its renewal.
The post frames the extension as surveillance of Americans and emphasizes Democrats who joined Republicans, with particular criticism of Golden’s earlier vote. Its language and selection of details indicate a left-leaning critique.
- Language tone — Describes the measure as allowing surveillance of Americans and calls it warrantless surveillance.
- Framing — Highlights Democrats voting with Republicans and singles out Golden’s prior vote.
- Source selection — Provides no supporting statement from lawmakers or advocates for the extension.
The article says four House Democrats voted with Republicans to advance an 18-month extension of FISA Section 702 without reforms, but the procedural measure failed. It reports that lawmakers instead approved a 10-day extension and notes Jared Golden’s earlier vote against a War Powers resolution.
The article identifies Marie Gluesenkamp Perez, Jared Golden, Thomas Suozzi and Josh Gottheimer as the four Democrats who voted with Republicans on the procedural measure for an 18-month, “clean” extension of FISA Section 702. It says the measure, H. Res. 1175, which would have advanced H.R. 8035, failed. The article describes the authorities as allowing surveillance of American citizens and characterizes the extension as warrantless surveillance.
The article says lawmakers later agreed to a 10-day extension, through April 30, by voice vote, and that the Senate concurred by voice vote. It also says Golden had previously been the only Democrat to vote with Republicans against a War Powers Act resolution, which failed 213-214.
Community verdict
11 VOTES- Readers of left-leaning coverage: 56% good look
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
People in this story
SWIPE →Representative who voted with Republicans on the procedural measure for an 18-month FISA Section 702 extension
Representative who voted with Republicans on the procedural measure for an 18-month FISA Section 702 extension
Gottheimer's version of this story ↗Representative who voted with Republicans on the procedural measure for an 18-month FISA Section 702 extension
Golden's version of this story ↗Representative who voted with Republicans on the procedural measure for an 18-month FISA Section 702 extension
Perez's version of this story ↗Speaker of the House who called lawmakers back into session and backed the shorter FISA extension
President whose demand for an 18-month FISA renewal is mentioned
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





