How they voted: Ryan, Riley on amended appropriations bill
Ryan voted no on the House’s amended federal funding bill.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Dailyfreeman, where this article appeared. The other scores rate the article itself.
Daily Freeman is a regional news publisher, while this item is attributed to Targeted News Service rather than a named Daily Freeman reporter. The vote-focused format and attributed statements support factual accountability, though the page provides little original reporting or broader context.
- Source type — Established local-news outlet, with a generally stronger baseline than an opinion or aggregation site.
- Author attribution — The item identifies Targeted News Service as the source, but not an individual reporter.
- Transparency — Vote tallies and lawmakers’ comments are attributed, and the service’s role is described at the end.
- Editorial standards — The passage offers limited evidence about corrections practices or original reporting.
The roundup gives specific vote counts, dates, measure descriptions and attributed arguments from supporters and opponents. It is useful as a voting record, but offers limited independent context and does not explain the full consequences of the measures.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The item regularly includes arguments from both supporters and opponents and reports the votes. It provides little external context, but its narrow purpose is to summarize congressional votes rather than assess the policy claims.
- Counterarguments presented — Supporter and opponent statements appear on the principal funding measure and several other proposals.
- Source diversity — Lawmakers on opposing sides of the votes provide the quoted perspectives.
- Omitted context — The article does not independently assess the claims or provide much outside policy context.
- Loaded language — Strong wording appears in attributed quotations, not in the article’s narration.
The roundup uses a largely neutral vote-reporting format and attributes competing arguments to supporters and opponents. It does not adopt one side’s position as its own.
- Language tone — The narration is procedural and matter-of-fact.
- Source selection — Supporters and opponents of several measures are both quoted.
- Framing — The article is organized around votes and tally results rather than an argument for a side.
Original publisher not identified
This article credits another publisher, which ChamberLight has not identified, so the scores are Dailyfreeman's own.
Reps. Pat Ryan and Josh Riley voted against an amended federal funding bill, while the article also reviews area senators’ votes on the funding measure and related proposals. The votes touched on reopening the government, worker pay during shutdowns and health care costs.
The House voted 222-209 on Nov. 12 to pass an amended continuing appropriations bill that would fund government programs through Jan. 30 and provide fiscal 2026 funding for several departments and programs. Reps. Pat Ryan and Josh Riley voted no. Supporter Tom Cole said the bill would reopen the government and restore services; Rosa L. DeLauro said it did not address rising costs or provide relief to families.
The roundup also describes Senate votes on the funding measure and amendments, including proposals related to health insurance tax credits, presidential spending cancellations and hemp-product rules. Senators also rejected a motion to advance Ron Johnson’s Shutdown Fairness Act, which would pay federal employees who continue working during a shutdown. The article gives lawmakers’ stated arguments for and against these measures and reports vote tallies.
Community verdict
25 VOTESPeople in this story
SWIPE →Representative who voted against the amended appropriations bill
Representative who voted against the amended appropriations bill
Riley's version of this story ↗Senator who supported advancing the continuing appropriations bill
Senator who voted on the funding bill and related proposals
Senator who sponsored a substitute appropriations amendment
Senator who opposed the continuing appropriations bill
Senator who supported the continuing appropriations bill
Senator who opposed Paul’s hemp amendment
Representative who supported the appropriations bill
Senator who sponsored a health insurance tax-credit proposal
Senator who opposed advancing the continuing appropriations bill
Senate majority leader who urged senators to advance the bill
Senator who opposed the continuing appropriations bill and voted on related measures
Senator who opposed the Shutdown Fairness Act
Senator who sponsored an amendment addressing presidential spending cancellations
Representative who opposed the appropriations bill
Senator who sponsored the Shutdown Fairness Act
Senator who sponsored an amendment on hemp-product rules
+4 MORESHOW FEWER
Senate vote · Roll call 614 · Nov 10, 2025HR 5371: Continuing Appropriations, Agriculture, Legislative Branch, Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, and Extensions Act, 2026Motion to Table · Motion to Table Agreed to · 76–24Senate vote · Roll call 609 · Nov 7, 2025S 3012: Shutdown Fairness ActCloture · Cloture on the Motion to Proceed Rejected · 53–43Amendment · S.Amdt. 3937In the nature of a substitute.Amendment · S.Amdt. 3950S.Amdt. 3950Discussion · 0
Loading comments…

















