Sen. Rick Scott: Prices Are Gonna Go Up, Suck It Up
Scott said gas prices would likely stay high until the Iran conflict ends and predicted they would later fall.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCrooks and Liars is a political blog, and this post is openly opinionated rather than a detached report. It identifies an author and attributes Scott’s remarks to CNN, but provides little sourcing or independent verification for its broader claims.
- Source type — Political blog with an openly partisan presentation.
- Editorial standards — The article uses opinionated language and offers little reporting beyond an excerpt of Scott’s remarks.
- Author attribution — The post names John Amato as its author.
- Transparency — Scott’s comments are attributed to CNN, but the post gives little additional sourcing or context.
The post includes a direct excerpt of Scott’s remarks and makes its disagreement clear, but supplies little context or evidence for either Scott’s claim about Democrats or the author’s assertions about health coverage and the war’s costs.
HOW WE SCORE ↗Scott’s remarks are included, but the author directly rejects his claims and offers no independent sources or countervailing context for the post’s criticisms.
- Counterarguments presented — Scott’s comments appear, but the post does not develop his reasoning beyond the excerpt.
- Loaded language — The author uses inflammatory wording to describe the war and its supporters.
- Source diversity — The post relies on Scott’s quoted remarks and the author’s assertions, with no additional sources.
- Opinion vs reporting — The author’s explicit rebuttal and condemnation dominate the presentation.
The post takes an unmistakably critical stance toward Scott and Trump, rejects Scott’s account of Democrats, and uses strongly negative language about the war and its supporters.
- Language tone — The author uses emphatic criticism and an expletive in the closing line.
- Framing — The post frames Scott’s remarks as dismissive of Americans facing higher costs.
- Source selection — Scott’s remarks are quoted, but the author’s own rebuttal supplies the article’s dominant perspective.
Sen. Rick Scott told CNN that the Iran war could keep gas prices high for a while, while predicting they would eventually fall. The author disputes Scott’s criticism of Democrats and argues that the war is imposing costs on Americans.
Scott said gas prices would likely remain high until the conflict with Iran ends, but predicted they could fall further as American oil and gas supplies come on line and the conflict reaches a positive resolution. He also accused Democrats of trying to destroy the U.S. oil and gas industry.
The author rejected Scott’s claim about Democrats, saying they support alternative fuels to address climate change. The author also blamed the Trump administration’s tax cuts for people losing health coverage and argued that the war would raise fuel costs for Americans, criticizing Scott for urging patience.
Community verdict
7 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 2
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: 50% good look
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator discussing the expected effect of the Iran war on gas prices
Senator whom the author says Trump is seeking to satisfy through the war
President whose Iran war and tax cuts the author says are contributing to higher costs and lost health coverage
Part of a bigger story
2 OUTLETS- ARTICLES
- 2
- OUTLETS
- 2
- AVG CRED
- 41
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


