Rand Paul, Lindsey Graham Cool To Vance As 2028 Candidate
Paul said Vance did not fit his preferred vision for the Republican Party.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCrooks and Liars is a blog, and this post combines its own openly opinionated framing with material attributed to the Daily Beast. The byline is identified, but the short item provides limited original reporting or sourcing beyond the interviews it summarizes.
- Source type — Blog format and overtly partisan commentary lower institutional credibility.
- Author attribution — The post names an author.
- Transparency — It attributes the interview reporting to the Daily Beast.
- Editorial standards — The short post offers little information about reporting or correction practices.
The post relays specific remarks from interviews and attributes the source material, but it is brief, relies on a narrow set of comments, and offers no response from Vance or context testing the claim about voter opinion. Its commentary and embedded social media post shape the presentation more than independent reporting does.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The post quotes Paul and reports Graham’s response, but frames their hesitation approvingly, asserts without supporting evidence that voters dislike Vance, and includes a highly critical social media post without a countervailing perspective.
- Counterarguments presented — Vance or his supporters are not given a response.
- Loaded language — The opening’s “Smart move” and the concluding social media post use evaluative language.
- Source diversity — The post relies on two interview remarks and an embedded social media post.
- Omitted context — The assertion about voters disliking Vance is not substantiated in the post.
The post uses strongly negative language about Vance and the Republican Party while praising the senators’ reluctance to support him. Its framing is plainly left-leaning rather than a neutral account of prospective endorsements.
- Language tone — The opening calls the senators’ stance a “Smart move” and says voters dislike Vance.
- Framing — The post frames non-support as a rebuke to Vance and ends with a social media post calling the Republican Party a cult.
- Source selection — It presents the senators’ remarks and a critical social media post without Vance’s response.
Links to The Daily Beast
Crooks and Liars links to this story. It was published by The Daily Beast.
927 stories · 71–72 · updated Oct 13, 2026
This is The Daily Beast's own score, and this article is credited to The Daily Beast. The host score in the Source Check is Crooks and Liars's.
Rand Paul said he would not support J.D. Vance as a prospective 2028 Republican nominee, while Lindsey Graham declined to say whether he would endorse him. The post presents their hesitation as a rebuke to Vance and favors their skepticism.
In separate interviews, Paul said the Republican Party needs representatives who support international trade, free-market capitalism and low taxes, and answered “no” when asked whether Vance fit that description. Graham did not answer whether he would join Erika Kirk in endorsing Vance, saying he was focused on the next day before pivoting to praise President Donald Trump’s escalation of tensions with Venezuela.
The post calls the senators’ stance a “Smart move” and asserts that voters dislike Vance. It notes that Vance had received endorsements from Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Erika Kirk, and includes a social media post criticizing several Republicans for past statements about Trump and their current support for him.
Community verdict
6 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 6
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: 60% good look
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 3 · ◆ 1 · ▼ 2
People in this story
SWIPE →Senator who said he would not support J.D. Vance as a prospective 2028 Republican nominee
Senator who declined to say whether he would endorse J.D. Vance
Graham's version of this story ↗President praised by Graham and discussed in an embedded social media post
Vice president discussed as a possible 2028 Republican nominee
Senator mentioned in an embedded social media post
Secretary of State who endorsed Vance
Part of a bigger story
5 OUTLETSRand Paul said he would not support Vice President JD Vance as a prospective Republican presidential nominee in 2028 and called for a free-market wing of the party. Left-leaning outlets present the refusal as a rebuke to Vance and connect it to Paul's preferred free-market direction. Center outlets focus on Paul's answer about Vance's 2028 prospects, alongside his free-market vision and endorsements Vance has received. Right-leaning outlets pair Paul's refusal with mocking reactions and doubts about his support among MAGA voters, shifting focus to Paul's prospects.
- ARTICLES
- 6
- OUTLETS
- 5
- AVG CRED
- 61
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…





