MAGA Mike Turns Into Olympic Runner When Asked About Trump's Appalling Remarks
Johnson declined to condemn Trump’s post when CNN’s Manu Raju asked him about it.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCrooks and Liars is a blog, and this piece is openly opinionated rather than a transparently sourced report. It names its author and quotes a CNN exchange, but provides little independent sourcing or context.
- Source type — A blog with an opinion-forward presentation rather than a conventional newsroom report.
- Editorial standards — The article uses highly evaluative language and offers little supporting reporting beyond the quoted exchange.
- Author attribution — A named author is listed.
- Transparency — The CNN reporter and speaker are identified, but no additional sources or reporting methods are supplied.
The article includes a direct exchange with an identifiable CNN reporter and quotes Johnson’s response, but it offers little corroboration or context and presents a strongly one-sided interpretation.
HOW WE SCORE ↗Johnson’s response is quoted, but the article provides no fuller defense or independent context and the author’s narration consistently condemns both Johnson and Trump.
- Counterarguments presented — Johnson’s brief explanation is included, but no other perspective or context is offered.
- Loaded language — The writer repeatedly uses strongly condemnatory language.
- Source diversity — The piece mainly relies on the exchange with Johnson and the author’s own characterization.
The article uses strongly critical language about Trump and Johnson, including in its headline and authorial narration. Its framing is distinctly anti-Trump and critical of Johnson’s response.
- Language tone — Uses loaded descriptions such as “pathetic,” “appalling,” and “no morals, no decency.”
- Framing — Frames Johnson’s answer as running away from a simple question.
- Headline — The headline calls Johnson’s response an Olympic-style escape and labels Trump’s remarks appalling.
The article criticizes House Speaker Mike Johnson for declining to condemn President Donald Trump’s remarks about Rob Reiner when CNN’s Manu Raju asked him about them. It presents Johnson’s response as an evasion.
The article describes Trump’s remarks following the deaths of Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele, as appalling, and says Trump expressed glee because Reiner had criticized him. CNN’s Manu Raju asked Johnson whether he condemned Trump’s post. Johnson said he did not provide ongoing commentary about everything said in government and that he was focused on health care costs and votes.
The article says Johnson brushed off Raju’s observation that other House Republicans were displeased with Trump’s remarks, and quotes Johnson saying he had already commented that morning. The author characterizes Johnson’s response as predictable and criticizes him for not condemning Trump.
Community verdict
5 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 6
- Readers of left-leaning coverage: 50% good look
- Readers of right-leaning coverage: not enough votes yet
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →President whose post about Rob Reiner prompted the question to Johnson
Part of a bigger story
6 OUTLETSOutlets agree that House Speaker Mike Johnson declined to comment when asked about President Donald Trump’s post about Rob Reiner. Left-leaning outlets largely frame Johnson’s refusal as evasion, while one reports that he later condemned the post. Center outlets pair a measured account of his refusal with a separate focus on Republican women’s complaints about his leadership.
- ARTICLES
- 6
- OUTLETS
- 6
- AVG CRED
- 62
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…



