Skip to main content
3 min read
● InformationalCongress / Members

Golfer-in-Chief Takes Aim At Daylight Saving Time

Trump urged Arkansas residents to pressure Cotton over his opposition to the Sunshine Protection Act.

Golfer-in-Chief Takes Aim At Daylight Saving Time
Image · Crooks and Liars

SOURCE CHECK

TAP FOR WHY
Outlet credibilityCrooks and Liars40/100 LOW
This article1 analysis · Oct 5, 2026
tl;dr

President Donald Trump posted Sen. Tom Cotton’s cellphone number and urged Arkansas residents to pressure him over the Sunshine Protection Act, which Trump said Cotton was holding up. The article frames the dispute around Trump’s effort to secure a Senate vote and his public criticism of Cotton.

Community verdict

VOTING CLOSED
How does this story look for
Tom Cotton R · AR · SEN
NOT RATEDCLOSED

No good or bad look here

This story reports what happened without casting Cotton in a good or bad light, so readers don’t rate it and it doesn’t count toward Cotton’s record.

● INFORMATIONAL

People in this story

SWIPE →
Tom Cotton
R · AR · SEN

Senator whose opposition to the bill Trump criticized

PRIMARY SUBJECT
Donald Trump
R · President of the United States

President who posted Cotton’s number and urged calls to pressure him

Trump's version of this story ↗
Mike Johnson
R · LA-4

Speaker credited by Trump with the House vote

Part of a bigger story

50 OUTLETS
Trump Presses Tom Cotton Over Permanent Daylight Saving Time Bill

Outlets agree that Trump urged people to contact Sen. Tom Cotton and posted a number he said belonged to Cotton as he pushed for permanent daylight saving time. Cotton opposes the change, citing dark winter mornings. Left-leaning outlets focus on Trump's public pressure and phone-number post, often presenting the disclosure as an inappropriate or ineffective tactic. Center outlets largely describe both sides' policy arguments and the phone-number episode. Right-leaning outlets often pair Trump's push with Cotton's winter-morning objection, though some portray Cotton as delaying action.

Discussion · 0

What's your take?

Loading comments…