2025 Crookies: Lifeboat Builder Of The Year, Marjorie Taylor Greene
The column casts Greene’s departure as an attempt to secure a political lifeboat and attacks a flattering profile of her break with Trump.

SOURCE CHECK
TAP FOR WHYCredibility rates Crooks and Liars, where this article appeared. The other scores rate the article itself.
Crooks and Liars is a blog publishing openly opinionated political commentary rather than a conventional reporting article. The author is identified, but the piece offers little verification for its factual claims and no visible correction or editorial-policy information.
- Source type — A political blog with an openly partisan commentary style.
- Editorial standards — The excerpt provides little indication of fact-checking or formal editorial standards.
- Author attribution — The post is attributed to driftglass, though no fuller author credentials appear.
Quality of the journalism in this article itself — sourcing, evidence, balance — independent of the host site's reputation.
HOW WE SCORE ↗The column argues one side, sharply criticizes Greene and the profile, and provides no substantive response from the profile’s author or other countervailing perspective.
- Opinion vs reporting — The piece is an overtly satirical opinion column, not a balanced report.
- Loaded language — The author’s descriptions of Greene and the media coverage are consistently derisive.
- Source diversity — It relies on the author’s commentary and selected quotations from the profile, without competing sources.
The author uses strongly derisive language toward Greene, the MAGA movement, and the Times profile’s sympathetic framing. The piece is openly critical rather than neutral reporting.
- Language tone — Repeatedly uses mocking and insulting descriptions of Greene and her political movement.
- Framing — Frames media coverage as constructing a political escape route for Greene.
- Headline — The satirical award title and description cast Greene in a critical light.
Original publisher not identified
This article credits another publisher, which ChamberLight has not identified, so the scores are Crooks and Liars's own.
The author portrays Marjorie Taylor Greene’s departure from Congress as an effort to secure a political “lifeboat” and criticizes a New York Times profile about her break with Trump as overly flattering.
The author claims Greene’s net worth grew substantially during her time in Congress and characterizes her decision to leave as an effort to get ahead of political troubles. The column presents several media appearances and profiles as helping build her political “lifeboat.”
The column calls the New York Times profile of Greene’s break with Trump mostly flattering and criticizes what it describes as familiar explanations for Republicans’ past support of Trump. It also quotes Greene saying she had matured but had not changed her views.
Community verdict
13 VOTESCounts every outlet’s report of this story. See all 8
Votes cast on this page
Votes cast on this page: ▲ 0 · ◆ 0 · ▼ 0
People in this story
SWIPE →Subject of commentary about her departure from Congress and a profile of her break with Trump
Former U.S. representative mentioned among Republicans the author says received career rehabilitation
Part of a bigger story
8 OUTLETSOutlets agree that Marjorie Taylor Greene left Congress, ending her service as a U.S. representative. Left-leaning outlets portray her departure as a self-serving political exit, emphasizing a political escape route and the timing of her pension. Center outlets focus on the resignation’s practical consequence, a special election, and reactions to her planned television appearance and Jasmine Crockett’s criticism. Right-leaning outlets welcome her departure, portray it as driven by self-interest, and note the special election’s effects on constituents.
- ARTICLES
- 8
- OUTLETS
- 8
- AVG CRED
- 54
Discussion · 0
Loading comments…


